Re: NO EVIDENCE

<EskWIRED@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:g0feli$6ai$2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In alt.religion.christian Adonis <zerocalories@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > That is NOT the logical conclusion.
>> >> >
>> >> Ok if the conclusion is not logical, what conclusion do you say is?
>> >
>> > Nobody has supplied you with proof.  That is all you can conclude.
>> >
>
>> Why are you contradicting your self?
>
> I'm not.
>
If the conclusion is based on all the "facts" you have, it does not matter
if 
there are more facts to ponder, you do not know about them. Then the
conclusion 
is logical. Yes it may be all you can conclude, but it is based on the
logic you 
have. The statement  2+2=4 is the only logical conclusion you can come to.
If 
2+2=4 is not the full statement, some parts of the statement are with
held, it 
is still the only logical conclusion you can come to. If some one were to
change 
the statement 2+2=4 to -|2|+2=4 you can then by logic know that the
statement is 
false.


>
> -- 
> The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always
so
> certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
> -- Bertrand Russel
>



-- 
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
 -- Bertrand Russel