Re: NO EVIDENCE

In alt.religion.christian Christopher A. Lee <calee@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2008 15:04:31 +0000 (UTC), EskWIRED@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> >In alt.religion.christian Adonis <zerocalories@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> >> <EskWIRED@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> >> news:g0epp8$b78$3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > In alt.religion.christian Bill M <wmech@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> I have asked numerous times for someone to provide any
> >> >> objective verifiable evidence that any gods actually exist.
> >> >
> >> >> No one has ever supplied it. Not even any god.
> >> >
> >> >> the logical conclusion is that no real gods exist except in
peoples over
> >> >> active imaginations.
> >> >
> >> > That is NOT the logical conclusion.
> >> >
> >> Ok if the conclusion is not logical, what conclusion do you say is?
> >
> >Nobody has supplied you with proof.  That is all you can conclude.

> Except of course that each and every cop out, excuse, claim that the
> evidence exists without providing it, ad hominem etc is a data point
> against.

Nope. 

> So far there are zillions against and none for.

So?  

> In spite of what you pretend the conclusion is obvious.

No reliable conclusions can be drawn without evidence.  Isn't 
that your very point?


> As well as falsfiiable. 

> It stands until it is falsified.

You jump to conclusions without any reliable evidence. 

-- 
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so 
certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
	-- Bertrand Russel