by Christopher A. Lee <calee@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
May 8, 2008 at 01:15 PM
On Thu, 08 May 2008 12:07:22 -0500, Antares 531
<gordonlrDELETE@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Thu, 8 May 2008 10:50:31 +0100, "Bill M" <wmech@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>wrote:
>
>>5-5-2008
>>
>>
>>
>>This is both an invitation and a challenge to religionists to provide
>>objective verifiable evidence that there is some REAL God that we need
to
>>cater to.
>>
>It would no longer be a matter of faith if we could empirically prove
>God's existence,
So what?
> but we can get closer to a proof than is
possible in
>many other situations which we accept and get along with. Can you
>"prove" that the sun won't super nova soon? My "belief" is that it
>won't, and I'll go on living for several more years.
Equivocation on "believe". A standard Christian dishonest
bait'n'switch from the unevidenced to the reasoned expectation based
on a lifetime of evidence.
