On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:43:35 GMT, Antares 531
<gordonlrDELETE@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:14:41 -0400, Christopher A. Lee
><calee@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:47:30 GMT, Antares 531
>><gordonlrDELETE@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:53:02 -0000, "BIll M" <wmech@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>I can't help but notice that no one can accept the God challenge.
>>>>
>>>>I posted a similer item several days ago and the message was deleted
by some
>>>>religious wacko. He doesn't mind 'sinning'!
>>>>
>>>>" Can anyone provide objective verifiable evidence that ANY REAL God
>>>>actually exists except in the imaginations of religionists???"
>>>>
>>>>There are hundreds of different God beliefs and religions.
>>>>Why does not any real God smite all the fakes and confirm to his
entire
>>>>flock that he is the real God and all the others are fakes???
>>>>
>>>First, to answer your core question, no, it is not possible to
>>>"empirically prove" the existence of God.
>>
>>Apart from the fallacy of special pleading (which begs the question
>>of its existence in the first place, which you cop out of answering),
>>the conclusion is obvious to everybody except those who already
>>believe.
>>
>>And the questions wouldn't even be asked if believers had the common
>>sense and courtesy to keep it within their religion.
>>
>>But they have neither. So the question gets asked in the "put up or
>>shut up" sense. And the repeated cop outs and other dishonesty of the
>>non-answers tells us plenty both about them and the hypothetical
>>object of their belief.
>>
>How would you suggest God should have handled this?
What a remarkably stupid question that begs the same question you keep
copping out of answering.
Which AGAIN would not have been asked if you had the sense to keep it
inside your religion.
|
