"duke" <duckgumbo32@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:5na7u35k54va33jl3dkavd0i47qmsmnjm5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:31:06 GMT, "John Smith" <bobsyoungbro@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"duke" <duckgumbo32@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:5ao5u3piu4r21738g3c1phahj9v1cshd9l@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:39:42 GMT, "John Smith"
<bobsyoungbro@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> So tell me, johnny boy. What is "objective & verifiable" evidence?
>>>
>>>>Objective means unbiased - which you have shown that you are not.
>>>
>>> Nope, sorry. All evidence to be found demands the existence of God.
>>>
>>>>Verifiable means that there are FACTS than actually can be checked for
>>>>accuracy and agreeability.
>>>>You don't have that either.
>>>
>>> If I did, I'd have proof, not evidence.
>>>
>>> Want to try again.
>>
>>
>>and ... and "if" you had a brain ... you'd be an atheist.
>
> My brain and my heart tell me that the only reality that makes sense is
> the
> existence of Almighty God.
bull**** duke, that's not evidence duke, that's just your imagination
wanting something else because your life is obviously so bad here on earth
>
> duke, brainwashed christian nutcase
|
