"duke" <duckgumbo32@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:g5k4u3df4fmggm762acv9eq9vsi5kjejh6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:36:18 -0000, "BIll M" <wmech@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>
>>>>> The evidence kicks you in the butt every day and you still refuse to
>>>>> acknowledge
>>>>> it.
>
>>>>What EVIDENCE??? Where is it??? You keep making these silly claims
>>>>without
>>>>EVER substantiating them with some objective verifiable evidence!
>
>>> That's the part you clowns don't understand. Neither "objective" nor
>>> "verifiable" are required by the definition of evidence. If you have
>>> those
>>> things, you have proof, not evidence.
>
>>> And to think people like you have NEVER figured that out all this
time.
>
>>I've given up debating with idiots.
>
> You quit talking to yourself? Come on, willie. Answer the question -
> what is
> "objective/verifiable" evidence?
are you that deaf, dumb and stupid that you don't know, duke?
>
>
> duke, brainwashed dumbass
|
