John Smith wrote:
> "duke" <duckgumbo32@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:49k4u311t0kf3gb2olj1s948ka0vnrcb6f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 04:13:15 GMT, "John Smith"
<bobsyoungbro@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>>>What EVIDENCE??? Where is it??? You keep making these silly claims
> >>>>without
> >>>>EVER substantiating
> >>>>them with some objective verifiable evidence!
> >
> >>> That's the part you clowns don't understand. Neither "objective"
nor
> >>> "verifiable" are required by the definition of evidence. If you
have
> >>> those
> >>> things, you have proof, not evidence.
> >>> And to think people like you have NEVER figured that out all this
time.
> >
> >>You have no evidence.
> >>You have no proof.
> >>All you seem to have is a big mouth and a lot of ignorance.
> >
> > So tell me, johnny boy. What is "objective & verifiable" evidence?
>
> Objective means unbiased - which you have shown that you are not.
> Verifiable means that there are FACTS than actually can be checked for
> accuracy and agreeability.
> You don't have that either.
John, this idiot Duke is not a religionist believer in any god at all,
he is here to take the piss [so he imagines] out of posters as a kind of
game.
There's better things to do with one's timme.
I dumped the sick asshole, already
>
>
> >
> > I claim such a thing is no longer evidence but proof. That fits the
> > definition.
>
> What you psychotically claim has nothing to do with reality.
>
> >
> >
> > duke, American-American
> > *****
> > "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
> > Pope Paul VI
> > *****
|
