Re: WHICH IS THE REAL GOD?

"Paul Ransom Erickson" <prerickson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:g1plt3p3ki5e6ttir3kljoabfl9q2g65pu@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 13 Mar 2008 20:29:01 -0500, bob young <alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>>Paul Ransom Erickson wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 11:09:44 -0500, "Pastor Frank" <PF@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote:
>>> >"BIll M" <wmech@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> >news:FYmyj.4397$rE5.70@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> >> "Gordon L. Richard" <gordonlr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> >> news:Dvmyj.59639$Pv2.1054@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> >>> "spacegamer777" <spacegamer777@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> >>>
news:f3147b97-f7b2-4a7e-8549-45c6a6df93dd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> >>>> On Feb 28, 7:26 pm, "Gordon L. Richard" <gordo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>>> >>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>> "BIll M" <wm...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> >>> (snip)
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Adam was indeed made from the very elements of the earth. He 
>>> >>>>> wasn't
>>> >>>>> like
>>> >>>>> Superman whose body had some of that element, krypton, from 
>>> >>>>> another
>>> >>>>> planet/star system. And, Eve was made from the same material. 
>>> >>>>> After
>>> >>>>> Adam
>>> >>>>> class males mutated into a form with a much better speech center

>>> >>>>> of
>>> >>>>> their
>>> >>>>> brain there was not found a female suitable for a mate for the 
>>> >>>>> Adam
>>> >>>>> class
>>> >>>>> males. Aparently this mutation was carried by Adam's Y
chromosome 
>>> >>>>> and
>>> >>>>> the
>>> >>>>> females didn't inherit it.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Adam named the animals...used nouns, but aparently the females
did 
>>> >>>>> not
>>> >>>>> have
>>> >>>>> this capacity in the speech center of her brain. There wasn't a 
>>> >>>>> female
>>> >>>>> found
>>> >>>>> who was suitable as a mate for the Adam class males. The females

>>> >>>>> may
>>> >>>>> have
>>> >>>>> been able to use something equivalent to verbs, but
understanding 
>>> >>>>> nouns
>>> >>>>> seems to have been beyond her capacity.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> It may be that God resolved this set of problems by causing a
>>> >>>>> retrovirus to
>>> >>>>> infect Adam and transfer some of his DNA from the leukocyte
cells 
>>> >>>>> in
>>> >>>>> the
>>> >>>>> flat bones (ribs) of Adam's body into the reproductive cells
(ova) 
>>> >>>>> of
>>> >>>>> some
>>> >>>>> of the women. After that, both males and females of the Adam
class 
>>> >>>>> had
>>> >>>>> this
>>> >>>>> enhansed speech capacity.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> What????  What bible version do you use to come to that
conclusion?
>>> >>>> The bible says nothing like that.
>>> >>>> God Bless.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I have several versions but I like my King James version best. All
>>> >>> versions tell of Adam naming (using nouns) the animals. Then, 
>>> >>> immediately
>>> >>> saying that there was not a woman found that was suitable as a
mate 
>>> >>> for
>>> >>> Adam. Later, when this set of problems had been resolved the Adam 
>>> >>> class
>>> >>> males were taking for themselves wives as they chose, from the 
>>> >>> residual
>>> >>> populations of those earlier class females who didn't have this 
>>> >>> enhansed
>>> >>> speech capacity.  In Christ, Gordon
>>> >>
>>> >> Just more Biblical myths and fables!
>>> >    Shut up Bill! You can't manage beyond tra****ng and flaming. It's 
>>> > called
>>> >senile dementia. But in answer to Gord: The Bible mentions "giants in

>>> >those
>>> >days" and it's near certain, that they were remnants of Neanderthals,

>>> >which
>>> >indeed did not have "enhanced speech capacity".
>>>
>>> How would you know that neanderthals didn not have speech just as
>>> advanced as ours?  From what I have heard it appears that they had the
>>> throat and mouth equipment for it.
>>
>>It is very rare I agree with Pasty Frank, but I doubt neanderthals had
any 
>>more
>>speech capabilities than the apes of the time.  When early man did
manage 
>>a
>>simple language we would have seen the first gods, imagined then as they

>>are
>>today to 'chase away the evil spirits' [such as Frank]
>>
>>The chimps may one day learn to talk, then they can watch out for their 
>>first
>>chimp god - looking remarkably chimplike
>>
>>>
>>> Can you also tell me exactly how hairy they were?
>>
>>I would guess very hairy. we see throwbacks even today on occasions.  No
>>clothing had to add up to 'very hairy
>
> Ok, this is great.  You doubt neanderthals had much speech capability
> why?  That's all I'm asking.
> I was not asking whether you doubted that neanderthals had speech.
> It appears that they were at least capable of speech physically.  And
> their brains were larger than ours, although differently shaped in
> ways that might be telling.
> But I do like it that you picture them as also very hairy.
> What would make you think that they were so hairy?
> I'm not saying they weren't -- it's just that I would like to see a
> reason.
>
    How about they were hairy to keep warm? Why would YOU be hairy?