Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONIST

On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:57:07 -0000, "Malcolm McLean"
<regniztar@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>
>"Seon Ferguson" <seongf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>news:47d7198e$0$19237$5a62ac22@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> I like how none of the religionists replying actually offer any
evidence. 
>> Some even resort to childish name calling.
>>
>The challenge was for "objective, verifiable" evidence. The OP was very 
>picky about the sort of evidence he will accept.

Stop lying.

>Since gods cannot be observed directly, you have to observe what the god
has 
>done. 

Look up "begging the question", moron.

>     And the main thing the Christian God did was to found the Church.
The 

Prove it, liar.

>Church is an objective social reality with a clergy, membersm a
headquarters 
>and so forth. Statements about it can usually also be verified. So we
have a 
>piece of objective, verifiable evidence. Maybe not the best or the most 
>convincing evidence, but evidence that meets the criteria.

Churches are started by people until you demonstrate otherwise, moron.