Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONIST

Richo wrote:

> On Mar 12, 8:38 am, "Malcolm McLean" <regniz...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > "BIll M" <wm...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > > There is NO objective verifiable evidence that ANY Gods exist. Only
> > > subjective 'opinions' are available
> >
> > > Therefore it is logical to assume that God beliefs are purely the
> > > creations of man's imagination - not reality.
> >
> > > I challenge any religionist to supply objective verifiable
> > > evidence that their God exists in reality.
> >
> > Why isn't so obvious that God exists that any contrary position is
totally
> > untenable? That's a real question, and one answer is "there is no
God".
> >
> > However it is not the only answer. If we saw God face to face then
there
> > would be no distinction between morality and prudence, for instance.
> >
> So you assert.
> I dont see any reason to believe that either.
>
> > So you can have "evidence", but not necessarily "proof".
>
> What evidence?
>
> > Objective evidence - we'll agree that the Church exists, and is an
> > objectively real institution.

Yes man made, like buddhist temples, Taoist temples, Islamic temples etc
etc

>
>
> That is evidence of belief.
> You are changing the subject.
>
> > Verifiable evidence - you ought to be able to
> > verify that the Church in fact exists.

They exist alright and they burn and get hit by lightening too,
then they sometimes fail to exist as before

>
>
> Yeah and Choo Choo trains and fish.
> What about God?
>
> > Evidence for God? That's up to you.
>
> No its up to you. Got any?
>
> > Do you think it is plausible that this institution was founded by a
god?
> >
> No, why would I?
> And stop trying to change the subject.
>
> Mark.