Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Gods > Re: QUESTION FO...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 11 of 45 Topic 503 of 555
Post > Topic >>

Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS

by bob young <alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 7, 2008 at 10:24 PM

"Christopher A. Lee" wrote:

> On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 20:39:27 +0100, "thomas p." <gudloos@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Michael" <newsuser3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> skrev i en meddelelse
> >news:pan.2008.03.05.18.31.17.557496@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 11:54:42 +0000, BIll M wrote:
> >>
> >>> I challenge any religionist to supply "objective verifiable
evidence"
> >>> that
> >>> any God is real and exists outside of the imaginations of
religionists.
> >>
> >> I challenge any challenger of any religionist to supply something
that
> >> cannot be supplied; let's say prove the existence of sound that is
silent,
> >> or make a gold coin out of silver.  I already know that I have
carefully
> >> chosen my "straw man" so that you cannot comply; that is the purpose
of
> >> this exercise.
> >
> >What a very strange response.
>
> They can't give an honest response.
>
> If they can't "provide something that cannot be supplied" then they
> should keep their stupid yaps shut.
>
> They seem to be too stupid to realise these questions wouldn't even
> have been asked it they had the courtesy and common sense not to being
> their religion up where it is inappropriate.
>
> They might see nothing wrong with special pleading, inside their
> religion.
>
> But in the real world it is not exempt from real world methods and
> tools. Like logic, evidence etc.
>
> Of my two local model railroad clubs, I no longer go to the one where
> there is religious talk. The other one has it (and politics)
> explicitly banned in its rules; there is a reason for this, and the
> club even has a couple of ministers as members. We're there to talk
> and do model trains.

Trust that your trains are real; and you all don't go around the room
going
'poop poop'

smile

When I see an exceedingly solemn man, I know he is an exceedingly stupid
man. No
man of any humor ever founded a religion - never. Humor sees both sides.
While
reason is the holy light, humor carries the lantern, and the man with a
keen
sense of humor is preserved from the solemn stupidities of superstition.
[Robert Green Ingersoll]
 




 45 Posts in Topic:
QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
"BIll M" <wm  2008-03-05 11:54:42 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
"Sla#s" <phi  2008-03-05 17:05:14 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
John Locke <johnlocke9  2008-03-05 09:33:22 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
John Locke <johnlocke9  2008-03-05 09:36:54 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
Michael <newsuser3@[EM  2008-03-05 11:32:43 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
"BIll M" <wm  2008-03-05 14:43:20 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Blattus  2008-03-05 20:42:28 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
Michael <newsuser3@[EM  2008-03-05 11:31:25 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
"thomas p." <  2008-03-05 20:39:27 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-03-05 15:01:28 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-03-07 22:24:03 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
"BIll M" <wm  2008-03-05 14:44:22 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
"BIll M" <wm  2008-03-05 14:46:41 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-03-07 22:20:06 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
"Pastor Frank"   2008-03-08 02:35:42 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
Brian E. Clark <reply@  2008-03-08 02:38:07 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Blattus  2008-03-05 20:41:47 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-03-06 06:56:08 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-03-06 16:15:00 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-03-06 15:52:32 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
"BIll M" <wm  2008-03-06 17:04:45 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-03-07 14:16:12 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
"BIll M" <wm  2008-03-07 16:01:36 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-03-09 11:57:18 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
"BIll M" <wm  2008-03-09 13:54:12 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-03-09 15:11:05 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
Enkidu <fox_rgfszx@[EM  2008-03-09 20:20:02 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-03-18 06:55:52 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-03-09 20:44:03 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
"Pastor Frank"   2008-03-10 16:53:04 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-03-09 20:43:13 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
"Pastor Frank"   2008-03-10 16:55:31 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-03-09 03:21:57 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL  2008-03-07 20:40:10 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-03-07 14:16:37 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-03-07 22:25:02 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-03-09 11:58:18 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-03-09 20:45:15 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
Steve Hayes <hayesmstw  2008-03-06 19:19:35 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-03-07 22:27:02 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
"Pastor Frank"   2008-03-07 16:40:07 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
"BIll M" <wm  2008-03-07 16:05:05 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
"sameold" <m  2008-03-14 15:59:21 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-03-14 08:42:04 
Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS
"BIll M" <wm  2008-03-15 14:10:14 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri Jul 25 13:51:47 CDT 2008.