"TomP" <th_o_m_as_p@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:U2nyj.9950$xq2.7613@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "BIll M" <wmech@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:ejmyj.4372$rE5.3762@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> "TomP" <th_o_m_as_p@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:g6jyj.10113$5K1.2862@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> "BIll M" <wmech@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:f5fyj.112936$K27.77706@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>I have come across a Web site that provides clear irrevocable
>>>>evidence/facts that proves no real Gods exist.
>>>>
>>>> They also prove that no religion can provide the help and cures that
>>>> are claimed.
>>>>
>>>> http://godisimaginary.com/i4.htm
>>> Do you really consider this stuff to be "irrevocable evidence/facts
that
>>> proves no real Gods exist"? Why?
>>>
>>> If so, your standards of evidence are no higher than those of
religious
>>> fundamentalists and the Bush administration's faith based economic and
>>> military policies. Why do you think that the scientific impossibility
>>> of a literal six day creation and the historic implausibility of
certain
>>> allegorical tales in the Bible removes the possibility that any deity
>>> can exist?
>>>
>>> The gist of the 21 of 50 "proofs" that I read on your web site is that
>>> no god can possibly exist because the Bible and certain other
doctrinal
>>> points of Christianity can not be literally true. How can you
logically
>>> conclude that no god exists because the Bible and certain aspects of
>>> Christian doctrine are not literally true?
>>>
>>> How does the anecdotal and sometimes coincidental nature of near death
>>> experiences, miracles, and other so-called supernatural events that
>>> believers attribute to an omniscient, omnipotent, interventionist,
first
>>> and only cause creator god constitute "irrevocable evidence/facts that
>>> proves no real Gods exist"?
>>>
>>> By the way, I only read points 1, 2, 3, 4,5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 15,
19,
>>> 28, 33, 40, 45, 47, 48, 49, and 50. I mean geez, I only have a
limited
>>> amount of time to waste reading nincompoopery. If you believe there
is
>>> a point or are points I did not read that actually does provide
>>> "irrevocable evidence/facts that proves no real Gods exist," please
>>> identify this point or these points.
>>
>> Lot's of bluster but NO evidence. Do you have ANY objective verifiable
>> evidence that any God
>> actually exists except in peoples imaginations???
> Speaking of bluster . . . You forgot to address any of the points I
> raised. I presume you are unable to do so or you would have. Why don't
you
> take a deep breath and try again?
>
> No bluster at all. I simply asked six questions regarding the nature
and
> scope of what you referred to as "irrevocable evidence/facts that proves
> no real Gods exist." You were able to answer exactly none of those six
> questions.
>
> Anyway, I doubt there is any "objective verifiable evidence that any God
> actually exists." But that does not negate the existence of a god or
> gods. Besides, I make no such claim. You surely realize that because
the
> Biblical literalists are mistaken doesn't mean you are right. If you
> don't know that, you should know that.
Duh! Just more windy nonsense.
|
