Re: WHICH IS THE REAL GOD?

"Gordon L. Richard" wrote:

> "bob young" <alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:47CABFDC.C84D9679@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > "Gordon L. Richard" wrote:
> >
> (snip)>> > What????  What bible version do you use to come to that
> conclusion?
> >> > The bible says nothing like that.
> >> >
> >> > God Bless.
> >> >
> >> I have several versions but I like my King James version best. All
> >> versions
> >> tell of Adam naming (using nouns) the animals. Then, immediately
saying
> >> that
> >> there was not a woman found that was suitable as a mate for Adam.
Later,
> >> when this set of problems had been resolved the Adam class males were
> >> taking
> >> for themselves wives as they chose, from the residual populations of
> >> those
> >> earlier class females who didn't have this enhansed speech capacity. 
In
> >> Christ, Gordon
> >
> > I assume you do know that your version,
> > did not exist before the year 1200?
> >
> Quite true, but I don't have the language understanding that is required
for
> reading those earlier do***ents. I place my trust in the scholars who
have
> made these translations into a language that I do understand, and I
trust
> that had they been wrong, someone, somewhere down the line would have
called
> out the errors.

Your inability to understand human nature is remarkable.

Do you honestly believe that not one of those translators
would have added or subtracted his own concepts and/or emotions as he went
along?

We deal here with translations from at least three languages over hundreds
of
years with do***ents lost, parts missing, bits made up; in order to end up
with
a marketable book
[Oh yes they did marketing, even back in those days]

>
>
> In Christ, Gordon