Re: CLEAR INFORMATION PROVING NO GODS.

"Mary" <mary123@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:47c9f12a$1_3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Malcolm McLean" <regniztar@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:MdKdnftWSqUnRVTanZ2dnUVZ8j6dnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> "TomP" <th_o_m_as_p@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:g6jyj.10113$5K1.2862@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>  If you believe there is a point or are points I did not read that 
>>> actually does provide "irrevocable evidence/facts that proves no real 
>>> Gods exist," please identify this point or these points.
>>>
>> That's unreasonable.
>> A pat answer is that you can't prove a negative. So you cannot show
that 
>> there is no monster in Loch Ness. Except you can. You can show how much

>> food flows into and out of the loch, and when you do the calculations 
>> you'll see that there's just not enough for it to eat.
>>
>> The truth is that a lot of atheist arguments boil down to what I call
the 
>> "writing on the Moon" argument. If God exists, surely He'd make it 
>> completely untenable to hold the position that He doesn't exist. To an 
>> extent that's a legitimate argument, but a riposte can be "if there was

>> no God surely we'd have made belief in Him totally untenable by now".
The 
>> fact is that all religions except liberal Christianity and (a special 
>> case) Reform Judaism are untenable, by intellectuals. There's nothing 
>> about religion that protects it from the razor of science or
scholar****p. 
>> Young Earth Biblical literalism can be shot down quite easily, for 
>> example. But St Augustine did that back in the 5th century.
>>
>> So what atheists have got to do is chip away at the credibility of 
>> Christianity. Not, note, of "theism". Liberal Christianity, and the 
>> special case of Reform Judaism, are the only opponents still in the
ring. 
>> Christinas have to chip away at atheist credibility. It's slow, 
>> unsatisyfing, but it's the only way of conducting the debate, until God

>> does write those big letters on the Moon or some atheist really does
come 
>> up with something to discredit Christianity.
>>
>
> What I'd like to know is why the Christian God is so frightened of
showing 
> himself to people.  A god who hides cannot be a strong god - he should 
> come down from the clouds, turn off his invisibility option and actually

> start talking to people !!
Aren't you repeating the same argument godisimaginary.com presents in
point 
50?  Yes, you are actually.

If I may be so bold as to inquire, why didn't you read the web page 
containing the subject being discussed before you posted to a thread 
discussing this page?

I don't know why.  I really don't care why.  The question is, why do you 
believe I would or should know the answer to your question?