"BIll M" <wmech@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:ejmyj.4372$rE5.3762@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "TomP" <th_o_m_as_p@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:g6jyj.10113$5K1.2862@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> "BIll M" <wmech@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:f5fyj.112936$K27.77706@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>I have come across a Web site that provides clear irrevocable
>>>evidence/facts that proves no real Gods exist.
>>>
>>> They also prove that no religion can provide the help and cures that
are
>>> claimed.
>>>
>>> http://godisimaginary.com/i4.htm
>> Do you really consider this stuff to be "irrevocable evidence/facts
that
>> proves no real Gods exist"? Why?
>>
>> If so, your standards of evidence are no higher than those of religious
>> fundamentalists and the Bush administration's faith based economic and
>> military policies. Why do you think that the scientific impossibility
of
>> a literal six day creation and the historic implausibility of certain
>> allegorical tales in the Bible removes the possibility that any deity
can
>> exist?
>>
>> The gist of the 21 of 50 "proofs" that I read on your web site is that
no
>> god can possibly exist because the Bible and certain other doctrinal
>> points of Christianity can not be literally true. How can you
logically
>> conclude that no god exists because the Bible and certain aspects of
>> Christian doctrine are not literally true?
>>
>> How does the anecdotal and sometimes coincidental nature of near death
>> experiences, miracles, and other so-called supernatural events that
>> believers attribute to an omniscient, omnipotent, interventionist,
first
>> and only cause creator god constitute "irrevocable evidence/facts that
>> proves no real Gods exist"?
>>
>> By the way, I only read points 1, 2, 3, 4,5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 15,
19,
>> 28, 33, 40, 45, 47, 48, 49, and 50. I mean geez, I only have a limited
>> amount of time to waste reading nincompoopery. If you believe there is
a
>> point or are points I did not read that actually does provide
>> "irrevocable evidence/facts that proves no real Gods exist," please
>> identify this point or these points.
>
> Lot's of bluster but NO evidence. Do you have ANY objective verifiable
> evidence that any God
> actually exists except in peoples imaginations???
Speaking of bluster . . . You forgot to address any of the points I
raised.
I presume you are unable to do so or you would have. Why don't you take a
deep breath and try again?
No bluster at all. I simply asked six questions regarding the nature and
scope of what you referred to as "irrevocable evidence/facts that proves
no
real Gods exist." You were able to answer exactly none of those six
questions.
Anyway, I doubt there is any "objective verifiable evidence that any God
actually exists." But that does not negate the existence of a god or
gods.
Besides, I make no such claim. You surely realize that because the
Biblical
literalists are mistaken doesn't mean you are right. If you don't know
that, you should know that.
>
>
|
