Re: WHICH IS THE REAL GOD?

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:38:59 -0600, "Gordon L. Richard"
<gordonlr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>
>"BIll M" <wmech@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>news:P8kwj.108860$K27.3533@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>I challenge religious believers to provide objective verifiable evidence

>>that their god actually exists. The do***ents listed below are not 
>>'objective verifiable' evidence. They are merely the OPINIONS of ancient

>>men of unknown veracity
>>
>(snip)
>>
>Bill, would you, or would any of us for that matter, have anything 
>approaching sovereign will if God's existence could be empirically
proven? 
>If God's existence and agenda were undenyable, would'n we all be as
puppets, 
>whipped into complinace?
>
>What's wrong with the idea that we are presently going through a learning

>phase wherein we will all learn in depth, either directly or indirectly, 
>enough about sin and rebellion to make sure we won't ever try to go back
and 
>tinker around with it again, once we've passe through this school of hard

>knocks? 


I don't know what anybody else will say, but to me there is nothing
_wrong_ with such an idea.  It's just that there is no reason to think
it is true.

Most of us aren't arguing about what ideas sound ok...


----------------------------------

A skeleton, the philosophers say, cannot slobber.


Paul