Right about what? Why is you never supply objective verifiable evidence to
sup****t any of your religously sup****ted claims???
"duke" <duckgumbo32@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:2jt0s353eeihbqs7j4nuh3382n23j5lgr4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:04:01 -0800 (PST), mizlee <mizlee@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>On Feb 9, 3:49?pm, "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <kill...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>wrote:
>>> "duke" <duckgumb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>
>>> news:692sq3l6a2a3aoh07i0p7tcgm9pbchjrff@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>> > On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 19:15:21 -0600, "The poster formerly known as
>>> > Colleyville
>>> > Alan" <nos...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>> >>> An atheist rejects, an agnostic is unsure.
>>>
>>> >>No, a is the latin prefix for "not" so, for example, amoral means
not
>>> >>moral
>>> >>which is a different concept than immoral. ?Likewise, atheist means
>>> >>not a
>>> >>theist, i.e. not someone who believes.
>>>
>>> > And a-theist means "not theist". ?You reject/deny the evidence. ?If
>>> > you
>>> > were
>>> > just unsure of the evidence, you'd be an a-gnostic.
>>>
>>> there is NO EVIDENCE for the existence of a god.
>>> wake up from your stupidity and your brainwa****ng duke
>>
>>I am a relative newbie here and am continually bemused by the rantings
>>of "Duke." The more people point out to him the indefensibility of
>>his lunatic ramblings, the more tightly he clings to them.
>
> What makes you think I'm wrong and they're right?
>
> Rest assured, I'm not.
>
> duke, American-American
> *****
> "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
> Pope Paul VI
> *****
|
