On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:04:01 -0800 (PST), mizlee <mizlee@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Feb 9, 3:49?pm, "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <kill...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>wrote:
>> "duke" <duckgumb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>> news:692sq3l6a2a3aoh07i0p7tcgm9pbchjrff@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> > On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 19:15:21 -0600, "The poster formerly known as
>> > Colleyville
>> > Alan" <nos...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> >>> An atheist rejects, an agnostic is unsure.
>>
>> >>No, a is the latin prefix for "not" so, for example, amoral means not
>> >>moral
>> >>which is a different concept than immoral. ?Likewise, atheist means
not a
>> >>theist, i.e. not someone who believes.
>>
>> > And a-theist means "not theist". ?You reject/deny the evidence. ?If
you
>> > were
>> > just unsure of the evidence, you'd be an a-gnostic.
>>
>> there is NO EVIDENCE for the existence of a god.
>> wake up from your stupidity and your brainwa****ng duke
>
>I am a relative newbie here and am continually bemused by the rantings
>of "Duke." The more people point out to him the indefensibility of
>his lunatic ramblings, the more tightly he clings to them.
What makes you think I'm wrong and they're right?
Rest assured, I'm not.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
|
