Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Gods > Re: duke as ent...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 105 Topic 497 of 555
Post > Topic >>

Re: duke as entertainer

by Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 23, 2008 at 08:02 PM

Mary wrote:
> "bob young" <alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:C3E694C3.13FB9%alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> On 2/23/08 8:20 AM, in article 2-2202081620430001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ".R. L.
>> Measures" <2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <qv4ur31d4oeuadp51e5reh8ff48d066cgm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, duke
>>> <duckgumbo32@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 05:21:05 -0800, 2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (.R. L. Measures) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article 
>>>>> <47beb263$0$30991$5a62ac22@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>> Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I find duke's postings to these newsgroups to be highly
entertaining. 
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> really think that s/he should be on a national television comedy
show.
>>>>>> (Who knows? Perhaps s/he already is.) The postings show an ability
to
>>>>>> side-step questions and to display rudeness that equals the best
that
>>>>>> any politician has to offer (side-stepping) and the best of Groucho

>>>>>> Marx
>>>>>> (rudeness).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Keep it coming, duke. I applaud you!
>>>>> .  Duke/Earl is a major motivator on ARCR-C.   He provides almost
daily
>>>>> evidence illustrating that Loyola had it nailed.
>>>> And especially answers that you can't refute.
>>>>
>>> .  I offer no refutation for those who can be convinced that white is 
>>> black.
>>>
>>> "We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to
be
>>> white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
>>> - -  - Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
>> Duke does a wonderful job in encouraging atheists to do and say what
they 
>> do
>> and say here regularly.[He must open a few religious eyes as well -
real
>> WIDE!]
> 
> Yes, I agree.  Duke probably isn't aware of it but he is actually
shooting 
> himself in the foot with his stupid answers.

Agreed. A-greed. ("Oh get on with you" as Frankie Howerd might have said.)

> 
>> Keep up the god [I means 'the good'] work Doook
>>
> 
>
 




 105 Posts in Topic:
duke as entertainer
Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL  2008-02-22 20:30:39 
Re: duke as entertainer
2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R.  2008-02-22 05:21:05 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-22 12:27:45 
Re: duke as entertainer
2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R.  2008-02-22 16:20:43 
Re: duke as entertainer
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-02-23 01:31:05 
Re: duke as entertainer
"Mary" <mary  2008-02-23 07:48:53 
Re: duke as entertainer
Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL  2008-02-23 20:02:16 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-23 07:21:07 
Re: duke as entertainer
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-02-25 17:34:01 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-26 12:14:58 
Re: duke as entertainer
2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R.  2008-02-26 11:13:45 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-26 14:09:22 
Re: duke as entertainer
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-02-26 15:58:06 
Re: duke as entertainer
2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R.  2008-02-26 15:17:55 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-27 07:02:50 
Re: duke as entertainer
2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R.  2008-02-27 08:19:49 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-27 11:28:15 
Re: duke as entertainer
2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R.  2008-02-27 12:55:05 
Re: duke as entertainer
"Mary" <mary  2008-02-28 08:13:14 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-28 07:32:44 
Re: duke as entertainer
"Mary" <mary  2008-03-02 08:11:49 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-03-02 07:09:28 
Re: duke as entertainer
Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL  2008-03-07 20:31:25 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-03-07 14:21:31 
Re: duke as entertainer
"Mary" <mary  2008-03-18 07:48:14 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-03-18 06:37:01 
Re: duke as entertainer
Epi-Sode <ph666@[EMAIL  2008-03-18 20:43:39 
Re: duke as entertainer
Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL  2008-02-28 20:55:03 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-28 07:33:12 
Re: duke as entertainer
Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL  2008-02-29 21:04:46 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-29 07:00:25 
Re: duke as entertainer
Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL  2008-03-01 20:41:35 
Re: duke as entertainer
2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R.  2008-02-29 07:00:31 
Re: duke as entertainer
"Mary" <mary  2008-02-28 07:51:06 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-28 07:34:07 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-23 07:19:06 
Re: duke as entertainer
2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R.  2008-02-23 06:19:46 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-23 07:17:26 
Re: duke as entertainer
2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R.  2008-02-23 10:25:34 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-23 13:28:34 
Re: duke as entertainer
2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R.  2008-02-23 18:01:56 
Re: duke as entertainer
Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL  2008-02-23 20:00:22 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-23 07:17:57 
Re: duke as entertainer
2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R.  2008-02-23 06:21:46 
Re: duke as entertainer
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-02-25 17:33:02 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-22 12:26:57 
Re: duke as entertainer
2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R.  2008-02-22 16:17:21 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-23 07:21:29 
Re: duke as entertainer
2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R.  2008-02-23 10:27:00 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-23 13:29:10 
Re: duke as entertainer
2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R.  2008-02-23 18:02:51 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-24 05:51:30 
Re: duke as entertainer
2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R.  2008-02-24 05:47:33 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-24 13:55:48 
Re: duke as entertainer
2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R.  2008-02-24 14:27:49 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-24 17:21:18 
Re: duke as entertainer
2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R.  2008-02-24 20:05:37 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-26 12:16:23 
Re: duke as entertainer
2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R.  2008-02-26 11:18:38 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-26 14:10:19 
Re: duke as entertainer
2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R.  2008-02-26 15:19:04 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-27 07:03:08 
Re: duke as entertainer
2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R.  2008-02-27 08:22:38 
Re: duke as entertainer
Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL  2008-02-28 20:54:23 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-28 07:35:01 
Re: duke as entertainer
Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL  2008-02-29 21:02:57 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-29 07:01:46 
Re: duke as entertainer
Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL  2008-02-29 22:14:34 
Re: duke as entertainer
2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R.  2008-02-29 07:03:24 
Re: duke as entertainer
Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL  2008-03-01 20:41:19 
Re: duke as entertainer
2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R.  2008-02-29 06:55:18 
Re: duke as entertainer
Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL  2008-02-28 20:57:34 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-28 07:35:56 
Re: duke as entertainer
Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL  2008-02-29 21:01:11 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-29 07:04:07 
Re: duke as entertainer
Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL  2008-02-29 22:13:33 
Re: duke as entertainer
2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R.  2008-02-29 07:06:26 
Re: duke as entertainer
Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL  2008-03-01 20:40:56 
Re: duke as entertainer
Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL  2008-02-25 19:59:14 
Re: duke as entertainer
2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R.  2008-02-25 04:11:15 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-26 12:16:51 
Re: duke as entertainer
2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R.  2008-02-26 11:19:19 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-26 14:12:40 
Re: duke as entertainer
2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (•R.  2008-02-26 15:20:06 
Re: duke as entertainer
Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL  2008-02-28 20:55:36 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-29 07:04:57 
Re: duke as entertainer
Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL  2008-03-01 20:40:27 
Re: duke as entertainer
Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL  2008-02-25 19:58:01 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-26 12:17:44 
Re: duke as entertainer
Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL  2008-02-28 20:59:36 
Re: duke as entertainer
Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL  2008-02-23 20:04:20 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-23 07:22:46 
Re: duke as entertainer
Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL  2008-02-25 20:00:01 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-26 12:18:38 
Re: duke as entertainer
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-02-26 21:35:46 
Re: duke as entertainer
Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL  2008-02-28 20:58:45 
Re: duke as entertainer
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-02-25 17:35:32 
Re: duke as entertainer
"Mary" <mary  2008-02-23 07:47:29 
Re: duke as entertainer
Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL  2008-02-23 20:17:18 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-23 07:26:07 
Re: duke as entertainer
Epi-Sode <ph667@[EMAIL  2008-02-24 20:29:53 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-24 05:52:13 
Re: duke as entertainer
duke <duckgumbo32@[EMA  2008-02-23 07:23:29 
Re: duke as entertainer
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-02-25 17:37:04 
Re: duke as entertainer
"sjb071158@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-23 12:07:14 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sat Jul 26 0:23:13 CDT 2008.