Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Gods > Re: IM****TANT ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 44 of 58 Topic 493 of 555
Post > Topic >>

Re: IM****TANT QUESTION

by Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 22, 2008 at 07:54 AM

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:30:09 -0700, Ben Goren <ben@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>Dubh Ghall wrote:
>
> > Ben Goren wrote:
> >
> >> Your only other  intellectually honest option is  to claim that
> >> Osiris, Mithra, Bacchus, Jesus,  Adonis, Dionysus, and the like
> >> aren't gods  either, because /they're/ only  representations of
> >> mystical fairy-tale beings that  don't actually exist no matter
> >> how much you believe in them. And while there's a great deal of
> >> truth to  that approach,  it's an  extremely counter-productive
> >> one  from a  linguistic  perspective. Tell  somebody that  Zeus
> >> isn't a god, and they'll wonder what you've been smoking.
> >
> > Well almost.
> >
> > I was  raised a xtian,  so obviously  Jesus would not  have been
> > included in that list.
> >
> > However, it is only the statues that are not gods.
> >
> > It was  not statues of  Zeus, Hera,  Apollo, etc, that  lived on
> > Olympus, it was the gods them selves.
>
>That's the case  of the ancient Greeks; they  created statues that
>were representations of gods and knew full well that those statues
>were mere  representations -- caricatures,  if you will,  but done
>with dignity instead of humor.
>
>But that's not the case  of innumerable other religions, where the
>objects  they created  (and still  create  to this  day) were  not
>representations of gods, but the actual gods themselves.

I think that as Mark suggested, it is fat from simple.


>
>As somebody  who grew  up Christian yourself,  you should  be very
>well  familiar  with an  excellent  example  of that:  the  Golden
>Calf. To those who made and wor****ped it, it really /was/ a living
>and  powerful god. The  purpose of  the  story, of  course, is  to
>illustrate the error of their ways,  but it also does an excellent
>job of illustrating how a statue  can be an actual god, instead of
>merely a representation of one.

Sliding away a bit.

That golden calf thing, has had me wondering for many years now.

When I first learned the story, making golden calves, was what sinners
did, and I thought no more about it.

Later, when I had read a little more, I began to wonder, was there
maybe a link between the golden calf, and the bull of Mitra?


>
>Put yourself in the mind of those who made and wor****ped the Calf,

Mmm

That is easier said, than done.


>and not of those telling the story, and you'll understand.
>
>Cheers,
>
>b&
 




 58 Posts in Topic:
IM****TANT QUESTION
"BIll M" <wm  2008-02-13 14:09:13 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor  2008-02-13 13:08:45 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-02-13 16:37:20 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"BIll M" <wm  2008-02-13 20:08:51 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-16 07:49:49 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-02-16 16:17:09 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-02-18 06:03:09 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-02-20 22:48:01 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
El Guapo <natezenmaste  2008-02-18 06:57:09 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"David V." <  2008-02-13 13:40:06 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-02-13 21:15:49 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"Geoff" <geb  2008-02-13 17:24:54 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-02-13 23:52:32 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-02-13 20:13:01 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-02-14 02:05:50 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-02-18 06:07:15 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-02-20 22:50:01 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Blattus  2008-02-15 18:06:28 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-02-13 21:11:51 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-02-18 06:04:33 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-02-18 21:09:53 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-02-18 19:04:07 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-02-20 02:31:01 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-02-19 19:10:10 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-02-20 04:23:59 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"David V." <  2008-02-20 08:16:23 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-02-21 04:46:02 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-02-23 20:00:02 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-02-24 14:29:11 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-02-22 07:14:35 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-20 07:26:39 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-02-22 07:23:23 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-02-23 00:32:07 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-23 07:39:56 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
TT <tt@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-20 18:54:24 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-02-23 19:45:27 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-02-20 14:34:27 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-02-21 02:07:13 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-21 08:35:26 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-22 09:30:19 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-23 08:02:41 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-23 15:00:19 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-02-21 22:35:37 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-02-22 07:54:46 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-02-22 13:03:11 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-21 08:27:12 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-02-21 21:38:23 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-22 10:01:27 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-22 14:11:11 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-23 08:54:14 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-24 21:05:40 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-26 07:53:47 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-23 09:21:44 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-24 21:08:04 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-26 07:55:43 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-29 08:48:49 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-02-20 14:32:14 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"sameold" <m  2008-03-14 14:55:08 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sat Jul 26 0:26:17 CDT 2008.