Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Gods > Re: IM****TANT ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 39 of 58 Topic 493 of 554
Post > Topic >>

Re: IM****TANT QUESTION

by Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 21, 2008 at 08:35 AM

Ben Goren wrote:
> Dubh Ghall wrote:
> 
>  > As a  child, I  was taught that  statues, idols,  fetishes, etc,
>  > were  representations  of  gods,  and no  matter  how  much  you
>  > believed in them, they were still only representations.
> 
> Not to be  blunt or anything, but  that's a very...well...childish
> approach to the topic.
> 
> For a great many religious  believers across a very broad spectrum
> of  religions,  ancient and  modern,  the  artifacts are,  indeed,
> real, living  gods. Yes, it's bat****  insane, but it's  what they
> believe. And,  to be  honest, believing  in non-cor****eal  gods is
> every  bit  as  bat****  insane;  it just  adds  a  rather  feeble
> rhetorical device to the believer's quiver.
> 
> And it's  not just  inanimate objects that  experience apotheosis:
> almost every emperor you can name was also a god, and many animals
> (the actual animals, not their  spirit force or whatever) are gods
> as well.
> 
> That  they're   all  perfectly   mundane  real-world   objects  is
> completely irrelevant. To True Believers (TM) they're gods endowed
> with magical properties of some sort or another, and that's all it
> takes to make them gods.
> 
> Gods  of no  consequence  whatsoever beyond  whatever  goes on  in
> the  deluded minds  of  their wor****pers,  to  be sure...but  gods
> nonetheless.
> 
> Your  only other  intellectually honest  option is  to claim  that
> Osiris,  Mithra, Bacchus,  Jesus, Adonis,  Dionysus, and  the like
> aren't  gods either,  because  /they're/  only representations  of
> mystical fairy-tale beings that don't actually exist no matter how
> much you believe in them. And while  there's a great deal of truth
> to that approach, it's an  extremely counter-productive one from a
> linguistic perspective. Tell  somebody that Zeus isn't  a god, and
> they'll wonder what you've been smoking.

Saying that "Zeus isn't a god" is different than saying "Zeus is a god 
that doesn't exist." Where I agree with Dubh Ghall is that you can look 
at a statue that John Doe claims "this is a god" and say "that statue 
exists but the god that it's supposed to represent does not and thus the 
statue is not a god" just as you can say "the word 'Zeus' exists but the 
god that it's supposed to represent does not."
 




 58 Posts in Topic:
IM****TANT QUESTION
"BIll M" <wm  2008-02-13 14:09:13 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor  2008-02-13 13:08:45 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-02-13 16:37:20 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"BIll M" <wm  2008-02-13 20:08:51 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-16 07:49:49 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-02-16 16:17:09 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-02-18 06:03:09 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-02-20 22:48:01 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
El Guapo <natezenmaste  2008-02-18 06:57:09 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"David V." <  2008-02-13 13:40:06 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-02-13 21:15:49 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"Geoff" <geb  2008-02-13 17:24:54 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
cary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-02-13 23:52:32 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-02-13 20:13:01 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-02-14 02:05:50 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-02-18 06:07:15 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-02-20 22:50:01 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Blattus  2008-02-15 18:06:28 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-02-13 21:11:51 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-02-18 06:04:33 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-02-18 21:09:53 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-02-18 19:04:07 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-02-20 02:31:01 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-02-19 19:10:10 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
DanielSan <danielsan19  2008-02-20 04:23:59 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"David V." <  2008-02-20 08:16:23 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-02-21 04:46:02 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-02-23 20:00:02 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-02-24 14:29:11 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-02-22 07:14:35 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-20 07:26:39 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-02-22 07:23:23 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-02-23 00:32:07 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-23 07:39:56 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
TT <tt@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-20 18:54:24 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-02-23 19:45:27 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-02-20 14:34:27 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-02-21 02:07:13 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-21 08:35:26 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-22 09:30:19 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-23 08:02:41 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-23 15:00:19 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-02-21 22:35:37 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-02-22 07:54:46 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-02-22 13:03:11 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-21 08:27:12 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Christopher A. Lee <ca  2008-02-21 21:38:23 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-22 10:01:27 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-22 14:11:11 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-23 08:54:14 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-24 21:05:40 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-26 07:53:47 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-23 09:21:44 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-24 21:08:04 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-26 07:55:43 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Mike <prabbit1@[EMAIL   2008-02-29 08:48:49 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
Dubh Ghall <puck@[EMAI  2008-02-20 14:32:14 
Re: IM****TANT QUESTION
"sameold" <m  2008-03-14 14:55:08 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri Jul 25 2:36:22 CDT 2008.