by "Lee" <me@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Feb 14, 2008 at 12:05 AM
"BIll M" <wmech@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:e2Jsj.32142$1f.5845@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The Jesus story is totally implausible. It is not sup****ted by any solid
> objective verifiable evidence. Should we believe in a god for whom there
> is NO solid objective evidence? The evidence available is quite the
> contrary. It is totally implausible! This Jesus belief is based purely
on
> faith in totally implausible stories, not factual objective verifiable
> evidence of any kind.
>
>
>
The Jesus story fits so many beliefs, we are brought up to believe in the
guy yet there is no historical evidence for his existence.
Personally if thinking that he may have existed I like to think he
survived
the crucifixion thing and buggered of to Kathmandu or somewhere round
there
and spent the rest of his life chewing the fat over philosophy and perhaps
helping out the people around him.
As for bringing a message from god to mankind if Jesus existed he made a
complete balls up of it as there have been more religious wars in the name
of Christianity than much else in the past 2000 years except perhaps the
spin off known as Islam.
