by "Mary" <mary123@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Feb 12, 2008 at 07:27 PM
"thomas p." <gudloos@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:47b1f16e$0$2088$edfadb0f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Andrew" <thecroft@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> skrev i en meddelelse
> news:2008021216203850073-thecroft@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On 2008-02-12 16:01:28 +0000, "Mary" <mary123@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
>>
>>>
>>> "Bill M" <wmech@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:6Y_rj.29689$1f.2282@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> He created Adam from dirt and Eve from Adam's rib.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Then he 'supposedly' created Jesus, a god on earth, by impregnating
>>>> Mary
>>>> and having Jesus live a relatively normal childhood. He was a
carpenter
>>>> in
>>>> his adulthood until he was 30.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Then for one, two or three years (depending on which Bible you wish
to
>>>> believe)
>>>>
>>>> he lectured to a very small ****tion of the world population about his
>>>> wishes and commands.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why did he place himself on earth in such an irrational fa****on? Why
>>>> didn't he just follow Adam's simple direct process of coming to
earth?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> He apparently was incapable of reproducing his teaching in any
>>>> permanent
>>>> form as
>>>>
>>>> there are no original records of his existence or teaching. All that
>>>> exists are copies of copies by other men of totally unknown veracity
>>>> and
>>>> accuracy. There are NO originals - just copies of unknown origin.
How
>>>> can
>>>> we know what the originals said?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why would an all powerful God creator provide his creations with such
>>>> inaccurate and questionable instructions?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The whole God/Jesus story is about as believable as Aesop's Fables.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> We have two possiblilities here:
>>>
>>> 1. Jesus and God are COMPLETE morons,
>>> 2. God does not exist and either Jesus did not exist or was just some
>>> bloke.
>>
>> Or the other - and more likely option - that Bill's post is simply
>> tendentious rivel.
>>
>
> What sepecifically did he say that was wrong?
>
oh nothing. It's just that the religious nutcases resort to comments like
that when they haven't got anything intelligent to say to back up their
silly "invisible sky entity" arguments.
