On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 01:37:58 GMT, "Semper LibčrŽ"
<nopolicestates????!?Hje77@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>"JessHC" <jesshc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:4225605e-65e4-47e9-bc6e-f6fe6daa5063@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>Semper LibčrŽ wrote:
>> "Christopher A. Lee" <calee@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:a8vhq3tih0homfi74ahjhvp6rn59rr53ob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:07:00 GMT, "Semper Lib?r?"
>> > <nopolicestates????!?Hje77@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >
>> > >"Bill M" <wmech@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> > >news:tKNpj.66207$Mu4.41907@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >> God fanatics constantly make the claim the wonders and
>> > >> complexity of the world is proof of God.
>> > >
>> > >Complex AND purposefully organized....
>> >
>> > Where did you demonstrate "purposefully", moron?
>>
>> You don't see the universe as creating anything? That's quite funny.
The
>> entire system is one massive enviroment and life producing engine -
there
>is
>> even a name for it.
>>
>> I suppose the creators of Vista or Ford trucks, etc.. didn't have a
>purpose
>> either.... Oh, and don't forget to tell Steven Hawking you think he's
a
>moron. Lol!
>>
>> "The universe and the laws of physics seem to have been specifically
>> designed for us." - Stephen Hawking
>
>>Doesn't it strike you as odd that the ONLY references on the web to
>>this quote of Hawking's are from websites using it as an appeal to
>>authority sup****t of deity?
>
>Not really... since most scientists are rarely honest enough to promote
such
>a viewpoint, even among those that secretly hold to it, though the list
is
>growing.
Because they don't have it, liar.
Why do you lie about Hawking being a closet creationist, liar?
HAve you actually read any of his stuff, liar?
>If you want to challenge him making the statement, I suggest you write to
>him.... Other than that, he's just one person out of thousands expressing
>the anthropic principle, which is widely known and excepted.
Translation: the Liar For God can't produce the original in its
surrounding context.
We're talking to you, not Hawking.
|
