On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 11:49:17 -0800 (PST), "d.kalinovski@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
<d.kalinovski@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Albert Einstain, when a journalist brang him a book signed by 100 of
>profesors, which was proving that his theory of relativity is wrong,
>he shrugged his arms and with calm voice said "if it had been wrong, 1
>would have been enough".
Where, moron? Or are you just repeating creationists bull****?
>And here I see similiar situation, atheists try to prove that God just
>can`t exist,
Liar.
> and give hundreds of examples which are claimed to be
>evidence of no-God at all. But, why are you writing so much? Can`t you
>find one, strong evidence proving that there is no God?
Not our problem, mindless idiot.
You're the one claiming it has real world existence outside your
religion, to those who are also outside your religion.
So YOU have to prove it does.
>If you think that God used tornadoes to kill people in your country
>read Leibnitz, he answerd your questions decades ago, before you even
>asked them.
What a ****ing moron.
Figments of your deluded imagination don't do anything.
Are you really so pig ignorant you don't understand what "assuming for
the sake of argument" means?
>Why you are writing with such an agresion? Don`t you know civilized
>language?
Why are you such a deliberate, nasty, stupid liar?
Keep your bull**** to yourself and there wouldn't be any reaction.
>If there is no God why are you calling yourselves a-theists? (this
If the sky isn't green why can't you think, moron
It's a simple demographic description, moron. We don't "call ourselves
atheists". We are absent the property of theism.
>word exist only in contrary to theists - God believers). Can`t you
>find a better word to describe your point of view?
>You are also believers, but your faith is a negation of christianism,
Liar.
>you even wouldn`t exist without us.
Liar.
We'd all be atheists. Even you. There just wouldn't be the word.
|
