Re: EVIDENCE OF GODS

"duke" <duckgumbo32@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:8uloq3lhtpjipm4o3493q6mq0q3743juvr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>BTW **** for brains, an atheist is simply someone that does not practice
>>any form of theism.  There is no "wannabe" about it, you ****ing moron.
>
> NO, an atheist is one that denies/rejects the existence of God.   You
have 
> no
> sup****t for such a stupid idea other than your imagination.   You have
no
> sup****t for that foolishness.

So you have decided to create your own definitions.  There are people that

do not "reject the existence of God" but who simply do not believe in God
as 
they have been presented no convincing evidence.  At this newsgroup they
go 
by the term "atheist", i.e. not a theist.  Since you have redefined the
term 
atheist, what term do you use for those who do not believe in God and do
not 
believe that the evidence that theists present is sufficient to convice
them 
otherwise?  Oh, and please no insults in reply to this; an answer like "I 
call them idiots" is not a real answer.

Please be reminded that looking at evidence and saying that it is not 
convincing is quite different than accepting convincing evidence and then 
saying "I choose not to believe".