Re: EVIDENCE OF GOD

"Semper Libèr®" <nopolicestates????!?Hje77@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
message 
news:4kaqj.9244$w57.2588@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Midwinter" <midwinter_m@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:pcqdnYFA8-8PnzTanZ2dnUVZ8tbinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> "Semper   Libèr®" <nopolicestates????!?Hje77@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said :
>>
>> > Complex AND purposefully organized....  That is observable evidence
in
>> > the same way that any fool can recognize a complex and organized
>> > computer program as having an intelligent and purposeful
>> > creator/programmer.
>>
>> The trouble with this very common argument - the Watchmaker, I believe
> it's
>> usually called - is that if the complexity of the universe alone
requires
>> the existence of a creator, then the complexity of the creator must
> require
>> its own creator.
>
> In other words you agree its proof of a creator... you just can't place 
> the
> start of the singularity.

 sin·gu·lar·i·ty \"si?-gy?-'la-r?-te\ n, pl -ties (14c)
1  : something that is singular: as a : a separate unit b : unusual or 
distinctive manner or behavior : peculiarity
2 : the quality or state of being singular
3 : a point at which the derivative of a given function of a complex 
variable does not exist but every neighborhood of which contains points
for 
which the derivative does exist
4 : a point or region of infinite mass density at which space and time are

infinitely distorted by gravitational forces and which is held to be the 
final state of matter falling into a black hole

Note item 4. A singularity is not a creation. It is an existent piece of 
matter. It is not evidence of any gods.