On 22 Jan 2008 20:46:05 -0600, bob young <alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>
>
>Steve Hayes wrote:
>
>> On 22 Jan 2008 07:01:02 -0600, bob young <alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >Steve Hayes wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 19 Jan 2008 23:19:01 -0600, bob young
<alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >duke wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:03:52 -0800 (PST), SkyEyes
<skyeyes9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >There is *no* empirical or historical evidence that Jesus is
anything
>> >> >> >other than a fictional character (probably an amalgam created
from the
>> >> >> >personas of several itinerant first-century Jewish preachers).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> He's historical. As evidenced by scripture and the many writings
of others from
>> >> >> the time period.
>> >> >
>> >> >These writings were done hundreds of years later than the claimed
time, excatly
>> >> >when, is unknown.
>> >> >
>> >> >The first Bible of the kind you rely on possibly appeared around
1400.
>> >> >
>> >> >Words from such a book are NOT evidence
>> >>
>> >> And since the entity shown in the from line as "bob young" (whether
it exists
>> >> or not) is the sole arbiter and evaluator of evidence, there shall
be no
>> >> further discussion.
>> >
>> >Not at all Bwana we can discuss religions until the cows come home
>> >and in the end common sense and logic will always prevail
>>
>> If you say so, Shaman......
>
>...lost on me that one. My days in Africa were spent mostly in Malawi
[Nyasaland in
>those days]
>care to elucidate?
It's a title, like Bwana.
Neither is used in this part of the world.
--
Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web: http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/stevesig.htm
Blog: http://methodius.blogspot.com
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop
uk
|
