Steve Hayes wrote:
> On 22 Jan 2008 07:01:02 -0600, bob young <alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>
>>
>> Steve Hayes wrote:
>>
>>> On 19 Jan 2008 23:19:01 -0600, bob young <alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> duke wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:03:52 -0800 (PST), SkyEyes <skyeyes9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> There is *no* empirical or historical evidence that Jesus is
anything
>>>>>> other than a fictional character (probably an amalgam created from
the
>>>>>> personas of several itinerant first-century Jewish preachers).
>>>>> He's historical. As evidenced by scripture and the many writings of
others from
>>>>> the time period.
>>>> These writings were done hundreds of years later than the claimed
time, excatly
>>>> when, is unknown.
>>>>
>>>> The first Bible of the kind you rely on possibly appeared around
1400.
>>>>
>>>> Words from such a book are NOT evidence
>>> And since the entity shown in the from line as "bob young" (whether it
exists
>>> or not) is the sole arbiter and evaluator of evidence, there shall be
no
>>> further discussion.
>> Not at all Bwana we can discuss religions until the cows come home
>> and in the end common sense and logic will always prevail
>
> If you say so, Shaman.
>
> After all, you are The Arbiter.
>
>
Your mockery of Steve is unbecoming
|
