Steve Hayes wrote:
> On 22 Jan 2008 07:01:02 -0600, bob young <alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Steve Hayes wrote:
> >
> >> On 19 Jan 2008 23:19:01 -0600, bob young <alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >duke wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:03:52 -0800 (PST), SkyEyes
<skyeyes9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >There is *no* empirical or historical evidence that Jesus is
anything
> >> >> >other than a fictional character (probably an amalgam created
from the
> >> >> >personas of several itinerant first-century Jewish preachers).
> >> >>
> >> >> He's historical. As evidenced by scripture and the many writings
of others from
> >> >> the time period.
> >> >
> >> >These writings were done hundreds of years later than the claimed
time, excatly
> >> >when, is unknown.
> >> >
> >> >The first Bible of the kind you rely on possibly appeared around
1400.
> >> >
> >> >Words from such a book are NOT evidence
> >>
> >> And since the entity shown in the from line as "bob young" (whether
it exists
> >> or not) is the sole arbiter and evaluator of evidence, there shall be
no
> >> further discussion.
> >
> >Not at all Bwana we can discuss religions until the cows come home
> >and in the end common sense and logic will always prevail
>
> If you say so, Shaman.
>
> After all, you are The Arbiter.
I see myself more as an 'interested debater'
If you have some evidence rearding the existence of any god,
yours or anyone elses I would be keen to know about it.
>
>
> --
> Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
> Web: http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/stevesig.htm
> Blog: http://methodius.blogspot.com
> E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full
stop uk
|
