On 22 Jan 2008 07:01:02 -0600, bob young <alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>
>
>Steve Hayes wrote:
>
>> On 19 Jan 2008 23:19:01 -0600, bob young <alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >duke wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:03:52 -0800 (PST), SkyEyes <skyeyes9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >There is *no* empirical or historical evidence that Jesus is
anything
>> >> >other than a fictional character (probably an amalgam created from
the
>> >> >personas of several itinerant first-century Jewish preachers).
>> >>
>> >> He's historical. As evidenced by scripture and the many writings of
others from
>> >> the time period.
>> >
>> >These writings were done hundreds of years later than the claimed
time, excatly
>> >when, is unknown.
>> >
>> >The first Bible of the kind you rely on possibly appeared around 1400.
>> >
>> >Words from such a book are NOT evidence
>>
>> And since the entity shown in the from line as "bob young" (whether it
exists
>> or not) is the sole arbiter and evaluator of evidence, there shall be
no
>> further discussion.
>
>Not at all Bwana we can discuss religions until the cows come home
>and in the end common sense and logic will always prevail
If you say so, Shaman.
After all, you are The Arbiter.
--
Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web: http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/stevesig.htm
Blog: http://methodius.blogspot.com
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop
uk
|
