Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION

Christopher A.Lee <calee@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:qf1so31g6o1vgma2cc8ojq7uk18d8cr4gl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:17:33 -0500, Christopher A.Lee
> <calee@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>>On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:47:12 -0800, Kelsey Bjarnason
>><kbjarnason@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 07:00:02 +0000, Justin Case wrote:
>>>
>>>> "kingdoodlesquat" <neggerscheggers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>> message news:-dudnSmVouICCRTanZ2dnUVZ8tuqnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> Justin, I take it that was in the too difficult to answer pile
>>>>> then? 
>>>>>
>>>>> Do yourself a favour, the next time you want to try to make
>>>>> someone look like an idiot, try & make sure that someone isn't
>>>>> you. Have a think about what you want to say & then don't bother.
>>>>> It'll stop you looking like a total fool.
>>>> 
>>>> I don't need to try and make someone look like an idiot. 
>>>> Ridiculing those who have a different view is existence speaks for
>>>> itself. 
>>>
>>>Why?  If someone believes something patently absurd, why should we
>>>respect their beliefs?  Silly is silly.
>>
>>And we wouldn't even know they did if they had the sense to keep it to
>>themselves.
> 
> And it is dishonest to pretend that religion and reality are
> equivalent because they are both "different views of existence".
> 
> But this is standard theist behaviour.

Right, it's a 'conclusion' based on the same magical thinking which 
insists that whatever you believe about reality, is what reality becomes 
for you.