Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION

Justin Case wrote:
> "kingdoodlesquat" <neggerscheggers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> message news:-rednbTIUJaxEhTanZ2dnUVZ8qeknZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> If you'd look at the world through an open mind you might see there
>>> is more to your shallow vision of existence then you could imagine.
>>> Even modern physicists are looking into the possibilities of
>>> multiple dimensions and unlimited parallel universes.  You are no
>>> different than those in the past who have burned at the stake
>>> people who believed the earth was not the center of the universe.
Isn't 
>>> it ironic.  You are they who you condemn.
>>
>> An open mind would suggest that when you are shown something which is
>> undeniably true but is contrary to your beliefs, your beliefs are
>> changed.
>
> Your statement is contrary to what has happened throughout history. Many

> great thinkers and scientists have been condemned and put to
> death.  Do you think Galileo had an easy time talking about his
> theories?  Do a Google search on Sting or M-theory and see what you
> come away with.  Just because you don't agree with something does not
> make it false.  Quantum physics, space and time, black holes, etc
> make the idea of the existence of an entity outside of our physical
> awareness quite plausible.  A turtle cannot comprehend anything
> beyond the confines of its small pond, a dog would do nothing but pee
> on a computer placed in its area so what mmakes you think man is the
> pinacle of existence?

If you wish to use science as the basis for your religious concepts, it is

clear you have no faith as defined by all major and most minor religions.
I suspect however that you are just parroting what you have heard from 
others and not actually learned much about it.
"Quantum physics, space and time, black holes, etc  make the idea of the 
existence of an entity outside of our physical  awareness quite plausible.
"
implies that you don't have a clue about what a theory is.