Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION

"kingdoodlesquat" <neggerscheggers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:7tSdnQ-2D9muExTanZ2dnUVZ8tOmnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Make as many snide remarks as you desire but at least speak from an 
>> informed position.  The Judeo-Christian  God did not let his creation
be 
>> misled. The whole premise of Judismm and Christianity is that God gave 
>> man free will and man chose to obey his own will rather that the will
of 
>> God. It was mans choice, not God's.  God gave one simple "do not" and
man 
>> decided he knew better.   And even after Adam and Eve both screwed it
up 
>> for the rest of us, they still couldn't accept responsibility.  Eve 
>> blamed Satan and Adam blamed God because He provided the woman and then

>> blamed Eve.  Funny, how it still is the same today..  Now, more than 
>> ever, we still do the same thing. Liberalism makes us believe that no 
>> matter what happens to us we don't have to accept responsibility for
our 
>> own actions. You fail in school, it's the teachers or systems fault. 
You 
>> kill someone, it's because you were abused as a kid.  You  spill hot 
>> coffee on your lap, it's because McDonalds makes their coffee too hot. 
>> You're poor, it's because you are discriminated against/too ugly/too 
>> pretty/etc.  And it goes on.
>>
>>
>
> Thank you very much for your approval on how I might response to 
> falsehoods paraded as the truth. This informed position of which you 
> speak, how can you possibly claim to speak with any authority at all on 
> the original post? It stated that there were hundreds of gods & beliefs,

> how do we know which is the right one?
>
> Well, all you have done is taken the standard judeo-christian viewpoint
& 
> completely ignored the original point & therefore the thousands of other

> religions. You have not answered the question as to why your religion is

> right & you have gone off at a tangent over the blame thing. if your 
> judeo-christian god doesn't want "his" creation to be misled, why not 
> simply appear before all & say so? Or is that one in the too difficult
to 
> answer pile?

Anything is possible.  It just may be there is no supreme being  or Buddha

has the right view or none of them are correct.. There isn't anyone around

to confirm what is or isn't..  The point being you are the one who is
being 
intolerrant for condemning those who think differently than you as being 
fools..  There is more common sense in accepting the existence of such an 
entity rather than in denial.
>
>
>