Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION

"kingdoodlesquat" <neggerscheggers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:-rednbTIUJaxEhTanZ2dnUVZ8qeknZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> If you'd look at the world through an open mind you might see there is 
>> more to your shallow vision of existence then you could imagine.  Even 
>> modern physicists are looking into the possibilities of multiple 
>> dimensions and unlimited parallel universes.  You are no different than

>> those in the past who have burned at the stake people who believed the 
>> earth was not the center of the universe.  Isn't it ironic.  You are
they 
>> who you condemn.
>
> An open mind would suggest that when you are shown something which is 
> undeniably true but is contrary to your beliefs, your beliefs are
changed.

Your statement is contrary to what has happened throughout history.  Many 
great thinkers and scientists have been condemned and put to death.  Do
you 
think Galileo had an easy time talking about his theories?  Do a Google 
search on Sting or M-theory and see what you come away with.  Just because

you don't agree with something does not make it false.  Quantum physics, 
space and time, black holes, etc make the idea of the existence of an
entity 
outside of our physical awareness quite plausible.  A turtle cannot 
comprehend anything beyond the confines of its small pond, a dog would do 
nothing but pee on a computer placed in its area so what mmakes you think 
man is the pinacle of existence?

> Relgion of any variety never allows for the freedom of human thought 
> because it cannot control free thought. I have had many opinions of mine

> changed by real proof & tangible evidence, mainly as I obtained my
degree 
> in physics. Don't try & be clever & compare me with your religious
nutters 
> of yesteryear or you'll be exactly those those who sought to condemn.

Why shouldn't I compare you with religious nutters of yesterday?  Aren't
you 
displaying the same contempt for things which seem contrary to your
beliefs? 
Heck, it wasn't long ago that we were to drink lots of milk but today that

thinking is completely wrong.  Well, at least to we find out something
else.
tical
Yes, historically religion has been disastrous to humankind but it is mans

manipulation of spiritual thought to control people rather than
spirituality 
that has been wrong.

We  talk about "The Big Bang" being the beginning but that is a crock.  In

order for The Big Bang to have occurred, something had to be in existence 
and have occurred prior to the Big Bang in order for some event to have 
occurred.  It's no different than a fire cannot commence without a spark
to 
be in existence for ignition prior to the fire.  An event such as The Big 
Bang would have been almost miraculous if occurring as theoretically 
proposed  but why would time,space and all the laws of physics also have 
simultaneously been created?  Regardless of the magnitude of such a 
happening, it's inconceivable to believe that simultaneously time was 
created.   Or why was gravity created and convenientlly countered by 
centrifugal force?  Not to mention the entire electromagnetic spectrum.

Supposing there is a "God" then do you really expect men, at this early 
stage of existence, to be able to comprehend let alone explain His 
existence?  It wasn't that long ago that we invented the computer and
still 
don't know for sure what exactly gravity is.

If you're so sure there is no such thing as God then perhaps you can
explain 
how everything started and the reason life can exist.  I'll even except 
speculation.