Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Gods > Re: A VERY IM**...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 75 of 87 Topic 478 of 555
Post > Topic >>

Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION

by "Ji" <jiranz@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan 13, 2008 at 02:09 PM

The question is not clear exactly what it is that you want answered.

#1: presuming you meant gods
There are many gods. The religious books eg Bible and the secular records 
all agree on this. The hebrews selected one god out of the many and made
an 
alliance.They switched alliances as it suited them. When formulating their

contract with the god of the ten commandments ( said to be YHWH but could
be 
subject to scribal interference) they clearly state that switching 
allegiances had been their practice and that he would have to accept that 
fact about their past in doing future business with them.

#2: presuming you meant a God and multiple beliefs concerning him
It is a question of the identity of the head of the gods. The Bible says 
that YHWH stood in the Council of the Gods. The more ancient records show 
that this identity had to return home to assume the ruler****p of his 
homeworld, leaving his half brother in power here. The half brother was
the 
firstborn child but from a second wife whereas YHWH was the firstborn of
the 
first wife but born later than his half brother and that the disputed
right 
of ascension was the reason for the civil war which erupted in the heavens

as also recorded in the Bible. All debate and arguments relate to which of

these should be the true "God-head". The mystery school religions who 
motivate much of this world politics today are working towards
establi****ng 
the half brother as the supreme ruler whereas the rest sup****t YHWH either

by default of ignorance or by actively by opposing what they see
happening.

Real vs Fake?:
They are all real but they do not all have the authority they would like
to 
claim. The most ancient records indicate that cm man is the descendents of

genetic manipulation of the original species with alien dna. Spindoctors 
created a controlling mythology bringing us to where we are today. If one 
turns up on the White House lawn tomorrow with a real convincing story, we

know from the pattern given in the Bible that we are not to follow it or
do 
what it says. We do not know exactly who or what we are in the way that a 
child does not yet understand his inheritance, but we have been told that
in 
due course we outrank these who claimed to be gods and that we will judge 
them for their past behaviors towards us.

creations mislead?:
Do you feel you have been mislead? The fact that you now know this means
you 
are no longer being mislead.
We all possess the capacity to know the truth and for that truth to set us

free even in the face of ignorance, superstition and fear.
The truth is always out there.

I saw you accessed a number of groups with the same question which might 
indicate a troll intention but the question is very real and contains a 
certain appeal so I have assumed underlying sincerity. Be encouraged! You 
will get there!



"Bill M" <wmech@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:Owaij.39217$L27.32403@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> An im****tant question.
>
>
>
> There are hundreds of different God and religious beliefs.
>
>
>
> How does one know which if any is the real God and which are fakes?
>
>
>
> Why would any REAL God permit his creations to be so misled???
>
>
 




 87 Posts in Topic:
A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Bill M" <wm  2008-01-12 16:42:11 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Bill M" <wm  2008-01-12 17:16:08 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-01-13 07:41:10 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-01-13 09:18:35 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-01-12 17:50:51 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"kingdoodlesquat&quo  2008-01-13 02:24:58 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-01-12 22:00:05 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"kingdoodlesquat&quo  2008-01-13 03:09:31 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-01-12 22:14:54 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"kingdoodlesquat&quo  2008-01-13 03:25:56 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Justin Case" &  2008-01-12 20:04:43 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
Christopher A.Lee <cal  2008-01-12 23:06:15 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Justin Case" &  2008-01-13 06:15:31 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"kingdoodlesquat&quo  2008-01-13 04:10:12 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Justin Case" &  2008-01-13 06:50:00 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
DanielSan <petersonj07  2008-01-12 23:56:02 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Steve O" <h  2008-01-13 10:34:29 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-01-13 09:21:53 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Mike Painter"   2008-01-13 18:01:48 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Justin Case" &  2008-01-12 19:56:00 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"kingdoodlesquat&quo  2008-01-13 04:06:03 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"kingdoodlesquat&quo  2008-01-13 04:33:27 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Justin Case" &  2008-01-13 07:00:02 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"kingdoodlesquat&quo  2008-01-13 13:30:03 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-01-13 09:24:01 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
scottrichter422@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-16 07:35:12 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Justin Case" &  2008-01-17 02:40:17 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Steve O" <h  2008-01-13 10:38:14 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Justin Case" &  2008-01-13 06:54:33 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Steve O" <h  2008-01-13 10:41:02 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-01-13 09:25:47 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Mike Painter"   2008-01-13 04:52:16 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Justin Case" &  2008-01-13 07:08:23 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-01-13 09:28:35 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Mike Painter"   2008-01-13 18:07:53 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-01-13 00:23:47 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Justin Case" &  2008-01-13 07:12:43 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Steve O" <h  2008-01-13 10:49:56 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-01-13 09:41:00 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
Kenneth Doyle <nobody@  2008-01-17 01:03:10 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
DanielSan <petersonj07  2008-01-12 16:40:21 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
Michael <newsuser2@[EM  2008-01-15 19:24:05 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Lee" <me@[E  2008-01-13 00:38:47 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-01-13 07:41:37 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Lee" <me@[E  2008-01-13 14:17:30 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-01-13 20:49:33 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
BuddyThunder <nospam@[  2008-01-14 21:16:21 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-01-14 03:18:02 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-01-14 11:24:52 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Lee" <me@[E  2008-01-14 09:59:30 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-01-14 11:35:58 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Lee" <me@[E  2008-01-16 10:17:35 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-01-17 04:22:12 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Lee" <me@[E  2008-01-18 18:19:29 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-01-18 20:36:25 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor  2008-01-19 12:32:38 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Lee" <me@[E  2008-01-19 20:03:24 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Lee" <me@[E  2008-01-19 20:05:18 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-01-19 21:32:20 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-01-14 03:21:01 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-01-14 11:29:04 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Lee" <me@[E  2008-01-16 10:40:05 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-01-17 04:34:09 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Lee" <me@[E  2008-01-18 18:33:23 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-01-18 20:39:13 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor  2008-01-19 12:31:26 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
les_on_usenet <delete-  2008-01-19 20:24:57 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-01-20 03:03:02 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-01-20 07:53:49 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-01-19 21:37:22 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-01-19 21:26:02 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Lee" <me@[E  2008-01-19 20:28:10 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Pastor Frank"   2008-01-19 21:59:40 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlo  2008-01-13 09:30:25 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Ji" <jiranz  2008-01-13 14:09:12 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
"Bill M" <wm  2008-01-13 14:26:24 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
Meteorite Debris <epic  2008-01-15 00:02:20 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja  2008-01-16 00:22:05 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja  2008-01-16 00:42:45 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja  2008-01-16 00:47:12 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
Christopher A.Lee <cal  2008-01-16 08:17:33 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
Christopher A.Lee <cal  2008-01-16 08:28:39 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
Kenneth Doyle <nobody@  2008-01-17 01:05:37 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja  2008-01-16 00:53:41 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja  2008-01-16 00:58:02 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja  2008-01-16 00:59:56 
Re: A VERY IM****TANT QUESTION
Kelsey Bjarnason <kbja  2008-01-16 01:03:46 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sat Jul 26 0:19:38 CDT 2008.