Protagonist wrote:
> Bill M wrote:
> > The obvious evidence is that all god beliefs are no more than the
creations
> > of man.
> >
> > There are a thousands different religious/god beliefs. If there was a
REAL
> > god, why would he permit all this misleading information to mislead
and
> > confuse his flock?
> >
> >
> > Man can communicate with the whole world via TV, Radio, Cell Phone and
the
> > Internet.
>
> That's called the RF!
> Radio frequency, or RF, is a frequency or rate of oscillation within the
> range of about 3 Hz and 300 GHz.
>
> God don't use RF, but mans mined and soul.
> Can you see or hear RF without some sort manufactured converting device,
> like radio, TV etc.. invented by man?
> No!
> So how did GOD communicate with man thousands of years ago, when there
> was no radio or the knowledge to build one?
> JS
He didn't. The story tellers that made a living telling entertaining much
needed
yarns around the evening camp fires did all of the communicating.
The stories were remembered and later written down.
They had plenty of time - it went on like this for tens of thousands of
years
until the yarns became instinctive to the extent modern man can recognize
them
and still be made to feel incredulous.
It's all in the mind.
>
>
> >
> > Certainly any real God should be able to do equally well! Why would he
not
> > announce directly from his heaven that he is the real god and all the
others
> > are fakes? Why would he not smite all the fakes?
> >
> >
> >
> > Why does he permit all this confusion and doubt? The objective
evidence is
> > that all gods are purely the creation of men to assuage his panic fear
of
> > the finality of death.
> >
> >
> >
> > Does anyone have OBJECTIVE VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE that any god actually
> > exists??? The millions of opinions expressed over the centuries are
not
> > evidence. They are merely 'opinions'!
> >
> >
> >
> > Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not
omnipotent.
> > Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
> > Is he both able and willing? Then where does evil come from?
> > Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him a God?
> >
> >
> >
> > What distinguishes theology from mythology and astrology? All three
are
> > founded on myth, folklore and legend. NONE are based on scientific
knowledge
> > and objective, verifiable, reproducible evidence.
> >
> >
> >
> > The religious faiths are not founded on faith in God but faith in MEN.
> >
> > Religious texts? They were created centuries before the invention of
the
> > printing press. Written, interpreted, hand copied, modified, altered
and
> > recopied by hundreds of MEN over thousands of years by other MEN.
Inspired
> > by God? So MEN say. Which books are Scripture? The ones chosen by
MEN. What
> > do they mean? What MEN say they mean. Dictated by God? Just the
OPINION of
> > errant MEN. What is God telling you? Whatever MEN (ordinary selfish.
self
> > promoting, errant humans) CLAIM he is telling you. These religious
texts are
> > nothing but folklore, myth, contradictory and impossible stories
created by
> > MEN. There is not one shred of objective verifiable evidence that ANY
of
> > these ancient do***ents are the word of ANY God. The objective
EVIDENCE is
> > they are purely myths and fables.
> >
> >
> >
> > Of all the THOUSANDS of God beliefs and claims, how do we know which
is the
> > real God and which are fakes? What MEN tell their flock is the real
God
> >
> >
> >
> > There are is a wealth of different religious do***ents that proclaim
the
> > validity of various Gods. Which, if any, are correct?
> >
> >
> >
> > Here are just some of the religious texts and do***ents;
> >
> >
> >
> > Baha'i Sacrid writtings
> >
> > Life of Buddha - Dhammapada - Pali cannon
> >
> > The Bible - Christian religious do***ents - 18 English versions alone.
> >
> > No originals of the old or new testaments exist.
> >
> > The Book of Mormon - Church of Latter Day Saints
> >
> > The Analects - Confuscianism
> >
> > The Eddas and Sagas - Icelandic beliefs
> >
> > Wicca - Neo paganism of Greece and Rome
> >
> > Bhagavgita and Rig Veda - Hinduism
> >
> > Qur'an - Islam
> >
> > Adi Granth and Dasam Granth - canonical scripture of the Sikhs
> >
> > Ta****h - Jewism
> >
> > Tao-Te-Ching - Taoism
> >
> > Nag Hammadi - Gnostics
> >
> > Zhuan Falun - Falun Gong
> >
> >
> >
> > Of all these different Gods and belief systems which is the true one,
if
> > any, and which are fakes? None of these do***ents are any objective
> > evidence. They are all do***ents written, hand copied, modified and
further
> > copied, over the centuries, by errant men with their own personal and
> > selfish motivations. All of these do***ents, except the Book of
Mormon, were
> > hand written and hand copied over the centuries before the invention
of the
> > printing press. There is no way to determine authenticity or accuracy
of any
> > of these. The objective evidence is that they are a mixture of
inaccurate
> > history, myth, folklore and legend.
> >
> >
> >
> > Does it make sense to base ones life on myths and fables of ancient
men???
> >
> >
|
