Bill M wrote:
> The obvious evidence is that all god beliefs are no more than the
creations
> of man.
>
> There are a thousands different religious/god beliefs. If there was a
REAL
> god, why would he permit all this misleading information to mislead and
> confuse his flock?
>
>
>
> Man can communicate with the whole world via TV, Radio, Cell Phone and
the
> Internet.
That's called the RF!
Radio frequency, or RF, is a frequency or rate of oscillation within the
range of about 3 Hz and 300 GHz.
God don't use RF, but mans mined and soul.
Can you see or hear RF without some sort manufactured converting device,
like radio, TV etc.. invented by man?
No!
So how did GOD communicate with man thousands of years ago, when there
was no radio or the knowledge to build one?
JS
>
> Certainly any real God should be able to do equally well! Why would he
not
> announce directly from his heaven that he is the real god and all the
others
> are fakes? Why would he not smite all the fakes?
>
>
>
> Why does he permit all this confusion and doubt? The objective evidence
is
> that all gods are purely the creation of men to assuage his panic fear
of
> the finality of death.
>
>
>
> Does anyone have OBJECTIVE VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE that any god actually
> exists??? The millions of opinions expressed over the centuries are not
> evidence. They are merely 'opinions'!
>
>
>
> Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
> Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
> Is he both able and willing? Then where does evil come from?
> Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him a God?
>
>
>
> What distinguishes theology from mythology and astrology? All three are
> founded on myth, folklore and legend. NONE are based on scientific
knowledge
> and objective, verifiable, reproducible evidence.
>
>
>
> The religious faiths are not founded on faith in God but faith in MEN.
>
> Religious texts? They were created centuries before the invention of
the
> printing press. Written, interpreted, hand copied, modified, altered and
> recopied by hundreds of MEN over thousands of years by other MEN.
Inspired
> by God? So MEN say. Which books are Scripture? The ones chosen by MEN.
What
> do they mean? What MEN say they mean. Dictated by God? Just the OPINION
of
> errant MEN. What is God telling you? Whatever MEN (ordinary selfish.
self
> promoting, errant humans) CLAIM he is telling you. These religious texts
are
> nothing but folklore, myth, contradictory and impossible stories created
by
> MEN. There is not one shred of objective verifiable evidence that ANY of
> these ancient do***ents are the word of ANY God. The objective EVIDENCE
is
> they are purely myths and fables.
>
>
>
> Of all the THOUSANDS of God beliefs and claims, how do we know which is
the
> real God and which are fakes? What MEN tell their flock is the real God
>
>
>
> There are is a wealth of different religious do***ents that proclaim the
> validity of various Gods. Which, if any, are correct?
>
>
>
> Here are just some of the religious texts and do***ents;
>
>
>
> Baha'i Sacrid writtings
>
> Life of Buddha - Dhammapada - Pali cannon
>
> The Bible - Christian religious do***ents - 18 English versions alone.
>
> No originals of the old or new testaments exist.
>
> The Book of Mormon - Church of Latter Day Saints
>
> The Analects - Confuscianism
>
> The Eddas and Sagas - Icelandic beliefs
>
> Wicca - Neo paganism of Greece and Rome
>
> Bhagavgita and Rig Veda - Hinduism
>
> Qur'an - Islam
>
> Adi Granth and Dasam Granth - canonical scripture of the Sikhs
>
> Ta****h - Jewism
>
> Tao-Te-Ching - Taoism
>
> Nag Hammadi - Gnostics
>
> Zhuan Falun - Falun Gong
>
>
>
> Of all these different Gods and belief systems which is the true one, if
> any, and which are fakes? None of these do***ents are any objective
> evidence. They are all do***ents written, hand copied, modified and
further
> copied, over the centuries, by errant men with their own personal and
> selfish motivations. All of these do***ents, except the Book of Mormon,
were
> hand written and hand copied over the centuries before the invention of
the
> printing press. There is no way to determine authenticity or accuracy of
any
> of these. The objective evidence is that they are a mixture of
inaccurate
> history, myth, folklore and legend.
>
>
>
> Does it make sense to base ones life on myths and fables of ancient
men???
>
>
|
