Pmb wrote:
> "Pmb" <someone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:O5CdnQmL4PB_18HanZ2dnUVZ_oSnnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > "bob young" <alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > news:475B85B8.741070D1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >> Pmb wrote:
> >>
> >>> "Pastor Frank" <PF@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >>> news:475800ea$0$26000$88260bb3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> > "bob young" <alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >>> > news:47578DC4.41467809@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> >> Bill M wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> There are hundreds of different Gods and different religious
> >>> >>> beliefs.
> >>> >>> Which
> >>> >>> one is real and which are fakes???
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I know the answer to that one.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> How does any religionist know he is following the correct
religion
> >>> >>> and a
> >>> >>> real God?
> >>>
> >>> The answer depends on the particular person's beliefs and how they
came
> >>> to
> >>> their beliefs.
> >>
> >> He uses brains, common sense and logic and discovers that all gods
are
> >> invented
> >> by man,
> >
> > Nope. It is impossible to arrive at that conclusion by logic and/or
common
> > sense. And by "common sense" I'm not refering to your *opinion* of
what
> > common sense is, I'm referring to what is ratrionally considered by
the
> > majority of all people to be common sense. I'd wager that your "common
> > sense" is based on presumptions of that which you intend to prove and
thus
> > you'd be using cirgular logic.
> >
> > That conclusion cannot be arrived at through logic. That fact is so
well
> > known that any well educated scientist/philosopher will tell you that.
As
> > Richard Feynman (One of this centuries greatest physicist) said in his
> > book "The Meaning of if All," page 36
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
> > The thrid possibility of explanation of the phenomena is that the
young
> > man perhaps doesn't understand science correctly, that science cannot
> > disprove God and that a belief in science and religion is consistent.
I
> > agree that science cannot disprove the existance of God. I absolutely
> > agree. I also agree that a belief in science and religion is
consistent. I
> > know many scientists who believe in God.
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
> > The first two possibilities are very closely related to this one. I
can
> > scan the relavent pages and make them avaible online so the reader can
see
> > what the context is from which this quote is taken from.
> >
> > But by all means please do so, i.e. prove that "He uses brains, common
> > sense and logic and discovers that all gods are invented by man."
Again,
> > please do not use any assumptions of yours since they most likely will
be
> > designed so that you'd arrive at the answer you seek and end up being
> > circular logic. If you make a postulate then explain why you believe
that
> > postulate holds under any and all conditions.
> >
> > Pete
>
> Bob - Please disregard any question I posed to you. I've read some of
your
> other posts in this forum and I have a rule whereby I don't converse
with
> people who post so many insults against those people who disagree with
them.
> You can continue to respond to my comments but note that you will be
wasting
> your time and will thus be writing in vain since you are now being added
to
> my "block sender" list.
From that you make it perfectly clear I had you questioning your juvenile
beliefs.
One scored for common sense again
>
>
> Have a good life
>
> Pete
|
