Re: WHICH GOD IS REAL

"Geoff" <gebobs@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:AJudnS6x5dNBk8XanZ2dnUVZ_j-dnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> rjbjr wrote:
>>
>> Make the assumption that there is no God.
>
> It's good practice to begin with the null hypothesis.
>
>> What does that imply?
>
> Nothing. Did you want to test an alternative hypothesis?
>
>> That implies that in the only universe you can possibly experience,
>> YOU are the most intelligent assemblage of matter that has ever
>> "evolved" from the primordial slime.
>
> It implies nothing of the sort. However, the implication that Bill is
more 
> intelligent than you is likely true.
>
    Thanks for small mercies! Glad you didn't mention what is a more 
"intelligent assembly of matter" than man, or we would all be choking with

apoplectic laughter. 



-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com