Re: WHICH GOD IS REAL

rjbjr wrote:

> Make the assumption that there is no God.

It's good practice to begin with the null hypothesis.

> What does that imply?

Nothing. Did you want to test an alternative hypothesis?

> That implies that in the only universe you can possibly experience,
> YOU are the most intelligent assemblage of matter that has ever
> "evolved" from the primordial slime.

It implies nothing of the sort. However, the implication that Bill is more

intelligent than you is likely true.

> Won't you agree that is a scary thought?  If that is correct, we need
> to abandon all hope.

Hold firmly to that crutch then, moron.