"Uncle Vic" <address@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:75-dnaV224E7LMjanZ2dnUVZ_hisnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> IbeDavid wrote:
>>
>> REPLY: Ardent 'atheists' are not interested in the evidence,
>
> What evidence??? Pretty flowers and trees? The complicated human eye?
> The Bible?
>
>> they
>> wont consider the evidence if it comes from a christian website or a
>> christian in a NG, they come to the table with a personal
>> philosophical bias ,
>
> That bias has formed through years of examining your "evidence". We
know
> what you have to offer. A forged paragraph in Josephus. A phony Turin
> Shroud. A "feeling" you call God, which no rational person can feel. A
> bunch of logical fallacies, the worst of which is starting your argument
> with the assumption that God exists, then using that assumption to
sup****t
> the rest. In my six years posting at alt.atheism I have not seen one
> compelling argument for the existence of God. Not one.
>
So why then are you pu****ng your own god or devil called disbelief or
unbelief? Our Christian "God is love" (1 John 4:8,16) and we know that our
God exist, for we see God in every loving action.
Love isn't "rational", and that's why you can't see our God.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
