On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 09:16:43 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>"James" <bireda@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:d77bl35pcjrdoodnkmg2pfj8lc0l1jbvbs@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >Free Lunch <lunch@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>
>>>Re: DOES ANY GOD EXIST?
>>
>>>On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 11:45:17 -0600, in alt.atheism
>>>duke <duckgumbo32@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>><a81si3ljcb2s6htomdunpfduaor2t5l751@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
>>>>On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 12:24:13 -0000, "Bill M" <wmech@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>There is NO objective verifiable evidence for the existence of ANY
gods.
>>>>
>>>>Sure there is. You just prefer to profess that you know better, and I
>>>>disagree
>>>>with you.
>>>
>>>You keep asserting it, but never offer any reference to any of this
>>>supposed evidence. You act like you don't have any, but are too
pathetic
>>>to admit it.
>>>
>>>By the way, Christian doctrine tells us that we do _not_ KNOW. Claiming
>>>to KNOW is the Gnostic heresy.
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On the contrary, the Bible wants us to KNOW who created all these
>> things. Ge 1:1,
>
>The bible is a book. It is incapable of wanting anything.
And is authors were incapable of justifying any of their assertions.
The rule, "saying something does not make so" applies to authors
as well no matter who they are.
Les Hellawell
Greetings from
YORK****RE - The White Rose County


|