On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:50:13 -0500, "Pastor Frank"
<PF@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>"bob young" <alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:474E41D8.240850C1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Bill M wrote:
>>>
>>> Your information makes sense. I appreciate it.
>>> From my stand point, I interpret words as they are defined in the
>>> dictionary - not as they are defined by individuals. You have provided
>>> evidence he is creating his own personal definitions of words. Either
>>> that
>>> or I am completely misunderstanding him
>>
>> But from my recollection this is a fairly recent tack and one which PF
did
>> not
>> use eighteen months ago.
>> his new line is his efforts to get out of having to prove that his god
>> exists.
>> He can't of course so he adopted this love creation as the next best
>> thing.
>> As I have just asked PF, since his god was supposed to have created the
>> universe, without humans on it [they came later] how could he have done
so
>> if
>> he required human love in the first place to actually perform as a god?
>> Over to you PF.
>>
> Like I said: Our God is the ideal we follow, which happens to be love
>and care as exemplified in Jesus Christ, our God incarnate. Only love and
>care makes life worth living, all else is mere commentary.
Nah, this is ambiguous
Les Hellawell
Greetings from
YORK****RE - The White Rose County
|
