Re: A SIMPLE QUESTION

"bob young" <alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:474E41D8.240850C1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Bill M wrote:
>>
>> Your information makes sense. I appreciate it.
>> From my stand point, I interpret words as they are defined in the
>> dictionary - not as they are defined by individuals. You have provided
>> evidence he is creating his own personal definitions of words. Either 
>> that
>> or I am completely misunderstanding him
>
> But from my recollection this is a fairly recent tack and one which PF
did 
> not
> use eighteen months ago.
> his new line is his efforts to get out of having to prove that his god 
> exists.
> He can't of course so he adopted this love creation as the next best 
> thing.
> As I have just asked PF, since his god was supposed to have created the
> universe, without humans on it [they came later] how could he have done
so 
> if
> he required human love in the first place to actually perform as a god?
> Over to you PF.
>
    Like I said: Our God is the ideal we follow, which happens to be love 
and care as exemplified in Jesus Christ, our God incarnate. Only love and 
care makes life worth living, all else is mere commentary. 



-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com