"Michael Gray" <mikegray@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:9elnk3d16hdl4qnjmbntcgvirhg3abljm1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 27 Nov 2007 02:21:01 -0600, bob young <alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>Michael Gray wrote:
>>
>>> On 26 Nov 2007 21:13:02 -0600, bob young <alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >Michael Gray wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On 25 Nov 2007 23:08:01 -0600, bob young
<alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >"Christopher A.Lee" wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:04:24 +1030, Michael Gray
>>> >> >> <mikegray@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> >On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 21:16:22 -0800 (PST), Olrik
>>> >> >> ><olrik666@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> >> >> >wrote:
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >>On Nov 24, 10:52 am, Christopher A.Lee <ca...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> >> >> >>wrote:
>>> >> >> >>> On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 10:48:57 -0000, "Bill M"
>>> >> >> >>> <wm...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> >> >> >>> wrote:
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> >There are thousands of different God beliefs.
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> >If there is a real God why would it permit his flock to be
so
>>> >> >> >>> >terribly
>>> >> >> >>> >misled?
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> Why are you asking this on an atheist newsgroup, moron?
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> Do you get your rocks off starting cross-posting flame wars?
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>Relax, dude. Bill M has been posting for years here in a.a.
He's
>>> >> >> >>a
>>> >> >> >>genuine atheist. Chill out.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >Mr. Lee is an equal op****tunity anti-spammer.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >Bill M is known for starting cross-posts to various theist'
>>> >> >> >newsgroups; posts that seem to me to be intentionally
>>> >> >> >inflammatory.
>>> >> >> >Chris has every right to complain about this deliberate and
>>> >> >> >uncivil
>>> >> >> >provocation.
>>> >> >> >It is the same low gutter tactics that the criminal
>>> >> >> >fundamentalists
>>> >> >> >employ.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >Atheist or not, Bill is committing a social faux pas by
stooping
>>> >> >> >to
>>> >> >> >their level.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Yep.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >Bill is carrying out a public service
>>> >> >since groveling to imaginary gods is a mental disease
>>> >>
>>> >> That may be true, but it neither negates Christopher's nor my
>>> >> observations, nor excuses the stooping to the theists' abominably
low
>>> >> moral level.
>>> >> Such can be executed *without* degradation.
>>> >
>>> >Yes but I don't see any degradation in Bill's posts.
>>> >Other than when he gets some silly dodging and weaving reponse and
then
>>> >it is a
>>> >case of like with like.
>>>
>>> I was referring to the degredation of his techniques, stooping to
>>> deliberate and continuous unsolicited provocation, not his actual
>>> arguments.
>>
>>'A simple question do gods exist' is hardly unsolicited provocation. In
>>this day
>>and age when thousands die every month in opposing religious beleifs and
>>cults, the
>>question sits firmly in the humanist camp. IMO.
>>
>>Exactly what provocative statements do you have in mind?
>
> I have always thought of you as an especially logical chap, and am
> therefore surpisrised at your repeated mireading of my stance.
>
> I have not contended that any of his "statements" are provocative.
>
> I simply contend that his crossposts are unsolicited.
What posts are solicited??? Where is the Internet rule that posts need to
be
'solicited'?
Why don't you just be honest and say you don't like my post. Reasons why
would also be
beneficial.
> This is sup****ted by objective FACTS, and am at a loss as to why you
> have repeatedly misinterpreted my assertion of the plain facts, as
> sup****ted by posting logs.
What are these objective FACTS???
> Do you actually understand where I am coming from?
Your just dodging and weaving because you can't supply honest replies.
|
