Michael Gray wrote:
> On 25 Nov 2007 23:08:01 -0600, bob young <alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >"Christopher A.Lee" wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:04:24 +1030, Michael Gray
> >> <mikegray@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 21:16:22 -0800 (PST), Olrik <olrik666@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>On Nov 24, 10:52 am, Christopher A.Lee <ca...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >>> On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 10:48:57 -0000, "Bill M"
<wm...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> >There are thousands of different God beliefs.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> >If there is a real God why would it permit his flock to be so
terribly
> >> >>> >misled?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Why are you asking this on an atheist newsgroup, moron?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Do you get your rocks off starting cross-posting flame wars?
> >> >>
> >> >>Relax, dude. Bill M has been posting for years here in a.a. He's a
> >> >>genuine atheist. Chill out.
> >> >
> >> >Mr. Lee is an equal op****tunity anti-spammer.
> >> >
> >> >Bill M is known for starting cross-posts to various theist'
> >> >newsgroups; posts that seem to me to be intentionally inflammatory.
> >> >Chris has every right to complain about this deliberate and uncivil
> >> >provocation.
> >> >It is the same low gutter tactics that the criminal fundamentalists
> >> >employ.
> >> >
> >> >Atheist or not, Bill is committing a social faux pas by stooping to
> >> >their level.
> >>
> >> Yep.
> >
> >Bill is carrying out a public service
> >since groveling to imaginary gods is a mental disease
>
> That may be true, but it neither negates Christopher's nor my
> observations, nor excuses the stooping to the theists' abominably low
> moral level.
> Such can be executed *without* degradation.
Yes but I don't see any degradation in Bill's posts.
Other than when he gets some silly dodging and weaving reponse and then it
is a
case of like with like.
|
