Pastor Frank wrote:
> "bob young" <alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:4726CF5D.6BDAAC28@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Pastor Frank wrote:
> >> "Uncle Vic" <address@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >> news:Xns99D6CAD8EBCEBvicman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > One fine day in alt.atheism, bob young <alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> > bloodied us up with this:
> >> >> Uncle Vic wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>> Truth? What truth?
> >> >>
> >> >> Probably the same 'truth' that will be the subject the next
'Truth'
> >> >> sermon,
> >> >> there must be one due in the next couple of months, as Pastors
hold at
> >> >> least six a year.
> >> >> I wonder why?
> >> >
> >> > They're afraid the sheep might start thinking for themselves.
> >> >
> >> Why then don't atheists start thinking and get a sensible
definition
> >> for
> >> the word god, instead of the most ridiculous one, which is sure not
to
> >> exist.
> >
> > Try his one:
> >
> > "God" is an emotion that had to kill itself to pay a debt to itself
over
> > something it apparently can't forgive without the spilling of blood,
even
> > it's
> > own, to demonstrate it's "love" for the creatures it endlessly
delights in
> > tormenting and killing.
> > [With acknowledgements to JESSHC]
> >
> Thanks for one of your "ridiculous" definitions of God.
Then I guess you have no objection to taking each point and showing why
they
are rediculous ?
Thanks
> But if you don't
> mind, we prefer EVIDENCE of love, like Christ evidenced His love for us
> sinners on the cross of Calvary. That's why our Christian "God is love"
(1
> John 4:8,16). Merely professing an "emotion" won't do, for that may be a
> lie, but then atheists are easily fooled, aren't they? They hold
evidence in
> such low esteem, that they never bother to evidence any of their
assertions.
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
