"bob young" <alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:4726CF5D.6BDAAC28@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Pastor Frank wrote:
>> "Uncle Vic" <address@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:Xns99D6CAD8EBCEBvicman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > One fine day in alt.atheism, bob young <alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> > bloodied us up with this:
>> >> Uncle Vic wrote:
>> >
>> >>> Truth? What truth?
>> >>
>> >> Probably the same 'truth' that will be the subject the next 'Truth'
>> >> sermon,
>> >> there must be one due in the next couple of months, as Pastors hold
at
>> >> least six a year.
>> >> I wonder why?
>> >
>> > They're afraid the sheep might start thinking for themselves.
>> >
>> Why then don't atheists start thinking and get a sensible
definition
>> for
>> the word god, instead of the most ridiculous one, which is sure not to
>> exist.
>
> Try his one:
>
> "God" is an emotion that had to kill itself to pay a debt to itself over
> something it apparently can't forgive without the spilling of blood,
even
> it's
> own, to demonstrate it's "love" for the creatures it endlessly delights
in
> tormenting and killing.
> [With acknowledgements to JESSHC]
>
Thanks for one of your "ridiculous" definitions of God. But if you
don't
mind, we prefer EVIDENCE of love, like Christ evidenced His love for us
sinners on the cross of Calvary. That's why our Christian "God is love" (1
John 4:8,16). Merely professing an "emotion" won't do, for that may be a
lie, but then atheists are easily fooled, aren't they? They hold evidence
in
such low esteem, that they never bother to evidence any of their
assertions.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
