Re: QUESTION FOR RELIGIONISTS

On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:56:01 GMT, Will <someone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:


>> What the heck is R-14?  Something you've invented?

>Sorry.  It's a typo.  Should be C-14.  Radiocarbon dating uses the 1/2
>life of a radioactive isotop of carbon with an atomic weight of 14 to
>determine the age of an artifact. 

Not really.

>> You claim, as a fact, that your god acted (in some way - the details
>> are irrelevant).

>No, you silly atheist.

You CLAIMED THAT (not that you believe) that your god performed
miracles.

>> No, YOU have asserted that your god acted.  (Produced [an act]
>> miracles, produced [an act] signs and produced [an act] wonders.  Your
>> words, not mine.  I'm not responsible for your lack of understanding
>> what your words mean.)

>Yes, I have asserted confidence in the truth of the miracles that my God
>performed

No, you never mentioned confidence, you claimed that your god did, in
fact, accomplish miracles, which is a claim of possession of objective
evidence that your god objectively exists.  Stop changing your story,
now that you've been shown that you can't defend your STATED position.

>> A miracle is something happening that *CAN NOT* happen, not something
>> that's not very likely to happen.

>Really?  I thought a miracle was simply put an act of God.

So which are you going to provide proof of - that your god exists or
that he performs miracles?  All you've done so far is make asinine
assertions, then back away from them when you were caught.

(BTW, claiming that proof that God exists is that he performs miracles
is a more ludicrous assertion than any you've made yet.  Are you
REALLY in your teens [intellectually] yet?)
-- 
Al at Webdingers dot com
"My earlier views of the unsoundness of the Christian scheme of salvation
and the human origin of the scriptures, have become clearer and stronger
with advancing years and I see no reason for thinking I shall ever change
them."
- Abraham Lincoln